Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38626290›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2024

Data Preprocessing Techniques for AI and Machine Learning Readiness: Scoping Review of Wearable Sensor Data in Cancer Care.

Bengie L Ortiz, Vibhuti Gupta, Rajnish Kumar, Aditya Jalin, Xiao Cao, Charles Ziegenbein, Ashutosh Singhal, Muneesh Tewari, Sung Won Choi

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
36.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Artificial Intelligence Across the Drug Development Lifecycle.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bengie L Ortiz *Department of Pediatrics, Hematology and Oncology Division, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8484-5902
Vibhuti Gupta *School of Applied Computational Sciences, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6221-4712
Rajnish KumarDepartment of Pediatrics, Hematology and Oncology Division, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-2611-7330
Aditya Jalin *Department of Pediatrics, Hematology and Oncology Division, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-5535-4200
Xiao CaoDepartment of Pediatrics, Hematology and Oncology Division, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-8227-5098
Charles ZiegenbeinDepartment of Pediatrics, Hematology and Oncology Division, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-0583-2837
Ashutosh SinghalSchool of Applied Computational Sciences, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9172-1916
Muneesh TewariDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7781-3152
Sung Won Choi *Department of Pediatrics, Hematology and Oncology Division, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6321-3834
Michigan Medicine · USMeharry Medical College · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Training Program in Molecular HematologyT32HL007622 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SUNG WON CHOI, Jordan A. Shavit · 1986 to 2026
$9.2M
Phase I/II clinical trial of HDAC inhibition for GVHD prevention in children, adolescents, and young adultsR01CA249211 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHOI, SUNG WON · 2020 to 2024
$2.2M
Patient-Oriented Research and Mentoring in Hematopoietic Cell TransplantationK24HL156896 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SUNG WON CHOI · 2021 to 2026
$870k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA249211NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL156896NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWearable sensors are increasingly being explored in health care, including in cancer care, for their potential in continuously monitoring patients. Despite their growing adoption, significant challenges remain in the quality and consistency of data collected from wearable sensors. Moreover, preprocessing pipelines to clean, transform, normalize, and standardize raw data have not yet been fully optimized.

objectiveThis study aims to conduct a scoping review of preprocessing techniques used on raw wearable sensor data in cancer care, specifically focusing on methods implemented to ensure their readiness for artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) applications. We sought to understand the current landscape of approaches for handling issues, such as noise, missing values, normalization or standardization, and transformation, as well as techniques for extracting meaningful features from raw sensor outputs and converting them into usable formats for subsequent AI/ML analysis.

methodsWe systematically searched IEEE Xplore, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to identify potentially relevant studies for this review. The eligibility criteria included (1) mobile health and wearable sensor studies in cancer, (2) written and published in English, (3) published between January 2018 and December 2023, (4) full text available rather than abstracts, and (5) original studies published in peer-reviewed journals or conferences.

resultsThe initial search yielded 2147 articles, of which 20 (0.93%) met the inclusion criteria. Three major categories of preprocessing techniques were identified: data transformation (used in 12/20, 60% of selected studies), data normalization and standardization (used in 8/20, 40% of the selected studies), and data cleaning (used in 8/20, 40% of the selected studies). Transformation methods aimed to convert raw data into more informative formats for analysis, such as by segmenting sensor streams or extracting statistical features. Normalization and standardization techniques usually normalize the range of features to improve comparability and model convergence. Cleaning methods focused on enhancing data reliability by handling artifacts like missing values, outliers, and inconsistencies.

conclusionsWhile wearable sensors are gaining traction in cancer care, realizing their full potential hinges on the ability to reliably translate raw outputs into high-quality data suitable for AI/ML applications. This review found that researchers are using various preprocessing techniques to address this challenge, but there remains a lack of standardized best practices. Our findings suggest a pressing need to develop and adopt uniform data quality and preprocessing workflows of wearable sensor data that can support the breadth of cancer research and varied patient populations. Given the diverse preprocessing techniques identified in the literature, there is an urgency for a framework that can guide researchers and clinicians in preparing wearable sensor data for AI/ML applications. For the scoping review as well as our research, we propose a general framework for preprocessing wearable sensor data, designed to be adaptable across different disease settings, moving beyond cancer care.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningNeoplasmsWearable Electronic DevicesHumansartificial intelligencecancer caremachine learningmobile phonepreprocessingwearables

Identifiers

PMID38626290
PMCPMC11470224
OpenAlexW4394873395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.