Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38626209›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2024

Machine learning for predicting Chagas disease infection in rural areas of Brazil.

Fabio De Rose Ghilardi, Gabriel Silva, Thallyta Maria Vieira, Ariela Mota, Ana Luiza Bierrenbach, Renata Fiuza Damasceno, Lea Campos de Oliveira, Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho, Ester Sabino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabio De Rose GhilardiFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo-FMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9875-2339
Gabriel SilvaFaculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo-FSP USP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thallyta Maria VieiraUniversidade Estadual de Montes Claros-Unimontes, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Ariela MotaUniversidade Estadual de Montes Claros-Unimontes, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Ana Luiza BierrenbachFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo-FMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renata Fiuza DamascenoUniversidade Estadual de Montes Claros-Unimontes, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Lea Campos de OliveiraInstituto de Medicina Tropical da Faculdade de Medicina da USP-IMT USP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto FilhoFaculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo-FSP USP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ester SabinoFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo-FMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros · BRHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRInstituto de Medicina Tropical · PYUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

"Sao Paulo-Minas Gerais Center for Chagas Disease Treatment (SaMiTrop)"U01AI168383 · NIAID · FUNDACAO FACULDADE DE MEDICINA · PI Ester Cerdeira Sabino · 2022 to 2026
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI168383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChagas disease is a severe parasitic illness that is prevalent in Latin America and often goes unaddressed. Early detection and treatment are critical in preventing the progression of the illness and its associated life-threatening complications. In recent years, machine learning algorithms have emerged as powerful tools for disease prediction and diagnosis.

methodsIn this study, we developed machine learning algorithms to predict the risk of Chagas disease based on five general factors: age, gender, history of living in a mud or wooden house, history of being bitten by a triatomine bug, and family history of Chagas disease. We analyzed data from the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study (REDS) to train five popular machine learning algorithms. The sample comprised 2,006 patients, divided into 75% for training and 25% for testing algorithm performance. We evaluated the model performance using precision, recall, and AUC-ROC metrics.

resultsThe Adaboost algorithm yielded an AUC-ROC of 0.772, a precision of 0.199, and a recall of 0.612. We simulated the decision boundary using various thresholds and observed that in this dataset a threshold of 0.45 resulted in a 100% recall. This finding suggests that employing such a threshold could potentially save 22.5% of the cost associated with mass testing of Chagas disease.

conclusionOur findings highlight the potential of applying machine learning to improve the sensitivity and effectiveness of Chagas disease diagnosis and prevention. Furthermore, we emphasize the importance of integrating socio-demographic and environmental factors into neglected disease prediction models to enhance their performance.

Indexed as

Chagas DiseaseMachine LearningRural PopulationAdolescentAdultAgedAlgorithmsBrazilChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38626209
PMCPMC11093296
OpenAlexW4394841138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.