Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38626184›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

Transparent deep learning to identify autism spectrum disorders (ASD) in EHR using clinical notes.

Gondy Leroy, Jennifer G Andrews, Madison KeAlohi-Preece, Ajay Jaswani, Hyunju Song, Maureen Kelly Galindo, Sydney A Rice

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gondy LeroyDepartment of Management Information Systems, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85621, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4751-6680
Jennifer G AndrewsDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85621, United States.
Madison KeAlohi-PreeceDepartment of Psychology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85621, United States.
Ajay JaswaniDepartment of Management Information Systems, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85621, United States.
Hyunju SongDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85621, United States.
Maureen Kelly GalindoDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85621, United States.
Sydney A RiceDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85621, United States.

Funding

ENHANCING CURRENT CAPACITY FOR SURVEILLANCE OF AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS & OTH UR3DD000680 · DD · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI PETTYGROVE, SYDNEY · 2010 to 2014
$2.4M
Health Information Technology to Support Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) Risk Assessment for Early DiagnosisR01MH124935 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI LEROY, GONDY · 2021 to 2024
$1.6M
CDC Cooperative 5UR3/DD000680CDC HHS 5UR3/DD000680Centers for Disease ControlNCBDD CDC HHS UR3 DD000680NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH124935NIMH NIH HHS R01MH124935Prevention Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMachine learning (ML) is increasingly employed to diagnose medical conditions, with algorithms trained to assign a single label using a black-box approach. We created an ML approach using deep learning that generates outcomes that are transparent and in line with clinical, diagnostic rules. We demonstrate our approach for autism spectrum disorders (ASD), a neurodevelopmental condition with increasing prevalence.

methodsWe use unstructured data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) surveillance records labeled by a CDC-trained clinician with ASD A1-3 and B1-4 criterion labels per sentence and with ASD cases labels per record using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM5) rules. One rule-based and three deep ML algorithms and six ensembles were compared and evaluated using a test set with 6773 sentences (N = 35 cases) set aside in advance. Criterion and case labeling were evaluated for each ML algorithm and ensemble. Case labeling outcomes were compared also with seven traditional tests.

resultsPerformance for criterion labeling was highest for the hybrid BiLSTM ML model. The best case labeling was achieved by an ensemble of two BiLSTM ML models using a majority vote. It achieved 100% precision (or PPV), 83% recall (or sensitivity), 100% specificity, 91% accuracy, and 0.91 F-measure. A comparison with existing diagnostic tests shows that our best ensemble was more accurate overall.

conclusionsTransparent ML is achievable even with small datasets. By focusing on intermediate steps, deep ML can provide transparent decisions. By leveraging data redundancies, ML errors at the intermediate level have a low impact on final outcomes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAutism Spectrum DisorderDeep LearningElectronic Health RecordsChildHumansNatural Language ProcessingUnited Statesautism spectrum disordersdeep learningmachine learningnatural language processingtransparency

Identifiers

PMID38626184
PMCPMC11105145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.