Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38626137›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Higher correlation between neutralizing antibodies and surrogate neutralizing or binding antibodies in COVID-19 patients than vaccine recipients.

Hatairat Lerdsamran, Ratikorn Anusorntanawat, Kantima Sangsiriwut, Suteema Sawadpongpan, Jarunee Prasertsopon, Nattakarn Thinpan, Poj Intalapaporn, Ranida Techasuwanna, Pilailuk Okada, Pilaipan Puthavathana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hatairat LerdsamranCenter for Research Innovation and Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Ratikorn AnusorntanawatChaophraya Yommarat Hospital, Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Public Health, Suphanburi, Thailand.
Kantima SangsiriwutDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Suteema SawadpongpanCenter for Research Innovation and Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Jarunee PrasertsoponCenter for Research Innovation and Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Nattakarn ThinpanCenter for Research Innovation and Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Poj IntalapapornDepartment of Medical Services, Rajavithi Hospital, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ranida TechasuwannaDepartment of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Pilailuk OkadaDepartment of Medical Science, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Pilaipan PuthavathanaCenter for Research Innovation and Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5481-9156
Mahidol University · THMinistry of Public Health · THSiriraj Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study determined the seropositive rates and levels of antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 in 50 patients and 108 vaccinees using microneutralization test (MNT), surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT), chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA), and electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA). MNT, as the reference method, employed living clade S and Delta viruses to measure neutralizing (NT) antibodies, while sVNT employed wild type strain and Delta receptor-binding domains (RBD) as the test antigens to measure sVNT antibodies. CMIA and ECLIA employed only one version of RBD to measure the binding antibodies. Our study performed S gene sequencing of the test virus to exclude undesired mutants that might lead to changes in antibody levels in MNT assay. We showed that spike protein amino acid sequences of our Delta virus contained 13 amino acid changes, with 3 related to the reduced neutralization. The MNT assay showed a significant reduction in seropositive rates and antibody levels in the patients' sera when the Delta variant replaced clade S as the test virus. In contrast, the seropositive rates determined by sVNT assay using wild type strain RBD and Delta RBD were non-significantly different, suggesting that sVNT assay could not identify the difference between the antigenicity of wild type RBD and Delta RBD. Furthermore, the correlation between the levels of NT and sVNT antibodies was moderate with the patients' sera but modest with the post-vaccination sera. The seropositive rates in the patients, as determined by CMIA or ECLIA, were not different from the MNT assay using clade S, but not Delta, as the test virus. In all analyses, the correlations between the antibody levels measured by MNT and the other 3 assays were modest to moderate, with the r-values of 0.3500-0.7882.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralHumansNeutralization TestsSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralVaccines

Identifiers

PMID38626137
PMCPMC11020499
OpenAlexW4394841234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.