Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38625996›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Experimental validation and clinical feasibility of 3D reconstruction of coronary artery bifurcation stents using intravascular ultrasound.

Wei Wu, Akshat Banga, Usama M Oguz, Shijia Zhao, Anjani Kumar Thota, Vinay Kumar Gadamidi, Vineeth S Dasari, Saurabhi Samant, Yusuke Watanabe, Yoshinobu Murasato and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. High-Definition Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography: Lumen Size and Plaque Morphology.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  3. Advancements in Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Techniques: Insights From Computational and Bench Testing Studies.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Wei WuCardiovascular Division, Center for Digital Cardiovascular Innovations, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Akshat BangaCardiovascular Division, Center for Digital Cardiovascular Innovations, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2626-8219
Usama M OguzCardiovascular Division, Center for Digital Cardiovascular Innovations, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Shijia ZhaoCardiovascular Division, Center for Digital Cardiovascular Innovations, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Anjani Kumar ThotaCardiovascular Division, Center for Digital Cardiovascular Innovations, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Vinay Kumar GadamidiCardiovascular Division, Center for Digital Cardiovascular Innovations, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Vineeth S DasariCardiovascular Division, Center for Digital Cardiovascular Innovations, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Saurabhi SamantCardiovascular Division, Center for Digital Cardiovascular Innovations, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Yusuke WatanabeDepartment of Cardiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshinobu MurasatoDepartment of Cardiology and Clinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yiannis S ChatzizisisCardiovascular Division, Center for Digital Cardiovascular Innovations, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8955-0081
University of Miami · USNational Kyushu Medical Center · JPTeikyo University · JP

Funding

Patient-Specific Simulations to Guide Coronary Bifurcation StentingR01HL144690 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHATZIZISIS, IOANNIS S · 2019 to 2023
$3.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structural morphology of coronary stents and the local hemodynamic environment following stent deployment in coronary arteries are crucial determinants of procedural success and subsequent clinical outcomes. High-resolution intracoronary imaging has the potential to facilitate geometrically accurate three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of coronary stents. This work presents an innovative algorithm for the 3D reconstruction of coronary artery stents, leveraging intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and angiography. The accuracy and reproducibility of our method were tested in stented patient-specific silicone models, with micro-computed tomography serving as a reference standard. We also evaluated the clinical feasibility and ability to perform computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies in a clinically stented coronary bifurcation. Our experimental and clinical studies demonstrated that our proposed algorithm could reproduce the complex 3D stent configuration with a high degree of precision and reproducibility. Moreover, the algorithm was proved clinically feasible in cases with stents deployed in a diseased coronary artery bifurcation, enabling CFD studies to assess the hemodynamic environment. In combination with patient-specific CFD studies, our method can be applied to stenting optimization, training in stenting techniques, and advancements in stent research and development.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsCoronary AngiographyFeasibility StudiesHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalReproducibility of ResultsStentsUltrasonography, InterventionalX-Ray Microtomography

Identifiers

PMID38625996
PMCPMC11020600
OpenAlexW4394856614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.