Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38625961›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Trends, patterns and relationship of antimicrobial use and resistance in bacterial isolates tested between 2015-2020 in a national referral hospital of Zambia.

Misheck Shawa, Atmika Paudel, Herman Chambaro, Harvey Kamboyi, Ruth Nakazwe, Luke Alutuli, Tuvshinzaya Zorigt, Taona Sinyawa, Mulemba Samutela, Joseph Chizimu and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Misheck ShawaHokudai Center for Zoonosis Control in Zambia, Hokkaido University, Lusaka, Zambia.
Atmika PaudelDivision of Infection and Immunity, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3478-9452
Herman ChambaroCentral Veterinary Research Institute, Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, Lusaka, Zambia.
Harvey KamboyiDivision of Infection and Immunity, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Ruth NakazweDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Luke AlutuliDepartment of Pharmacy, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Tuvshinzaya ZorigtDivision of Infection and Immunity, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Taona SinyawaCentral Veterinary Research Institute, Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, Lusaka, Zambia.
Mulemba SamutelaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Joseph ChizimuZambia National Public Health Institute, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
Manyando SimbotweDepartment of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Kyoko HayashidaDivision of Collaboration and Education, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Japan.
Naganori NaoHokudai Center for Zoonosis Control in Zambia, Hokkaido University, Lusaka, Zambia.
Masahiro KajiharaHokudai Center for Zoonosis Control in Zambia, Hokkaido University, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0001-9478-0439
Yoshikazu FurutaDivision of Infection and Immunity, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4710-1389
Yasuhiko SuzukiDivision of Bioresources, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1313-1494
Hirofumi SawaHokudai Center for Zoonosis Control in Zambia, Hokkaido University, Lusaka, Zambia.
Bernard Hang'ombeAfrica Centre of Excellence for Infectious Diseases of Humans and Animals, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Hideaki HigashiDivision of Infection and Immunity, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5370-7865
Hokkaido University · JPUniversity of Zambia · ZMMinistry of Agriculture and Livestock · ZMUniversity Teaching Hospital · ZMMinistry of Health · ZM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among bacteria underscores the need to strengthen AMR surveillance and promote data-based prescribing. To evaluate trends and associations between antimicrobial usage (AMU) and AMR, we explored a dataset of 34,672 bacterial isolates collected between 2015 and 2020 from clinical samples at the University Teaching Hospital (UTH) in Lusaka, Zambia. The most frequently isolated species were Escherichia coli (4,986/34,672; 14.4%), Staphylococcus aureus (3,941/34,672; 11.4%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (3,796/34,672; 10.9%). Of the 16 drugs (eight classes) tested, only amikacin and imipenem showed good (> 50%) antimicrobial activity against both E. coli and K. pneumoniae, while nitrofurantoin was effective only in E. coli. Furthermore, 38.8% (1,934/4,980) of E. coli and 52.4% (2,079/3,791) of K. pneumoniae isolates displayed multidrug resistance (MDR) patterns on antimicrobial susceptibility tests. Among S. aureus isolates, 44.6% (973/2,181) were classified as methicillin-resistant (MRSA). Notably, all the MRSA exhibited MDR patterns. The annual hospital AMR rates varied over time, while there was a weak positive relationship (r = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.11-0.60) between the monthly use of third-generation cephalosporins (3GCs) and 3GC resistance among Enterobacterales. Overall, the results revealed high AMR rates that fluctuated over time, with a weak positive relationship between 3GC use and resistance. To our knowledge, this is the first report to evaluate the association between AMU and AMR in Zambia. Our results highlight the need to strengthen antimicrobial stewardship programs and optimize AMU in hospital settings.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliHospitalsHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeMicrobial Sensitivity TestsReferral and ConsultationStaphylococcus aureusZambiaAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID38625961
PMCPMC11020921
OpenAlexW4394856582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.