Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38625910›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

CO2 exposure drives a rapid pH response in live adult Drosophila.

Sandra G Zimmerman, Celeste A Berg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandra G ZimmermanDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2274-5471
Celeste A BergDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2605-1768
University of Washington · US

Funding

Regulation of tubulogenesis in the Drosophila ovaryR01GM079433 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BERG, CELESTE A. · 2009 to 2023
$4.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CO2 anesthesia is the most common method for immobilizing Drosophila for research purposes. But CO2 exposure has consequences-it can impact fertility, behavior, morphogenesis, and cytoskeletal dynamics. In this respect, Drosophila is an outstanding model for studying the impact of CO2 exposure on tissues. In this study we explored the response of intracellular pH (pHi) to a one-minute CO2 pulse using a genetically encoded, ubiquitously expressed pH sensor, tpHusion, to monitor pHi within a live, intact, whole fly. We compared wild-type flies to flies lacking Imaginal disc growth factors (Idgfs), which are chitinase-like proteins that facilitate developmental processes and the innate immune response. Morphogenetic and cytoskeletal defects in Idgf-null flies are enhanced after CO2 exposure. We found that pHi drops sharply within seconds of the beginning of a CO2 pulse and recovers over several minutes. The initial profile was nearly identical in control and Idgf-null flies but diverged as the pHi returned to normal. This study demonstrates the feasibility of monitoring pH in live adult Drosophila. Studies exploring pH homeostasis are important for understanding human pathologies associated with pH dysregulation.

Indexed as

DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsAnimalsCarbon DioxideDrosophila melanogasterHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationCarbon DioxideDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID38625910
PMCPMC11020609
OpenAlexW4394841608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.