Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38625898›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Bacterial community shifts of commercial apples, oranges, and peaches at different harvest points across multiple growing seasons.

Madison Goforth, Margarethe A Cooper, Andrew S Oliver, Janneth Pinzon, Mariya Skots, Victoria Obergh, Trevor V Suslow, Gilberto E Flores, Steven Huynh, Craig T Parker and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Madison GoforthSchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Margarethe A CooperSchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Andrew S OliverUSDA-ARS Western Human Nutrition Research Center, Davis, California, United States of America.
Janneth PinzonDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Mariya SkotsDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Victoria OberghSchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9030-8695
Trevor V SuslowDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Gilberto E FloresDepartment of Biology, California State University, Northridge, Northridge, California, United States of America.
Steven HuynhProduce Safety and Microbiology Research Unit, Western Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Albany, California, United States of America.
Craig T ParkerProduce Safety and Microbiology Research Unit, Western Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Albany, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7719-8882
Rachel MackelprangDepartment of Biology, California State University, Northridge, Northridge, California, United States of America.
Kerry K CooperSchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4541-1324

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing the microbes present on tree fruit carpospheres as the fruit enters postharvest processing could have useful applications, as these microbes could have a major influence on spoilage, food safety, verification of packing process controls, or other aspects of processing. The goal of this study was to establish a baseline profile of bacterial communities associated with apple (pome fruit), peach (stone fruit), and Navel orange (citrus fruit) at harvest. We found that commercial peaches had the greatest bacterial richness followed by oranges then apples. Time of harvest significantly changed bacterial diversity in oranges and peaches, but not apples. Shifts in diversity varied by fruit type, where 70% of the variability in beta diversity on the apple carposphere was driven by the gain and loss of species (i.e., nestedness). The peach and orange carposphere bacterial community shifts were driven by nearly an even split between turnover (species replacement) and nestedness. We identified a small core microbiome for apples across and between growing seasons that included only Methylobacteriaceae and Sphingomonadaceae among the samples, while peaches had a larger core microbiome composed of five bacterial families: Bacillaceae, Geodermtophilaceae, Nocardioidaceae, Micrococcaeceae, and Trueperaceae. There was a relatively diverse core microbiome for oranges that shared all the families present on apples and peaches, except for Trueperaceae, but also included an additional nine bacterial families not shared including Oxalobacteraceae, Cytophagaceae, and Comamonadaceae. Overall, our findings illustrate the important temporal dynamics of bacterial communities found on major commercial tree fruit, but also the core bacterial families that constantly remain with both implications being important entering postharvest packing and processing.

Indexed as

Citrus sinensisPrunus persicaBacteriaFruitHumansSeasons

Identifiers

PMID38625898
PMCPMC11020611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.