Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38625615›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2024

Molecular dynamics simulation of the effect of temperature on the conformation of ubiquitin protein.

Junpeng Hu, Shanshan Song, Mengting Yu, Yihang Yu, Zhaoyang Ju, Yufen Wang, Xiaoyong Cao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Junpeng HuCollege of Chemical & Material Engineering, Quzhou University, Quzhou, 324000, Zhejiang, China.
Shanshan SongCollege of Chemical & Material Engineering, Quzhou University, Quzhou, 324000, Zhejiang, China.
Mengting YuCollege of Chemical & Material Engineering, Quzhou University, Quzhou, 324000, Zhejiang, China.
Yihang YuCollege of Chemical & Material Engineering, Quzhou University, Quzhou, 324000, Zhejiang, China.
Zhaoyang JuCollege of Chemical & Material Engineering, Quzhou University, Quzhou, 324000, Zhejiang, China. jzy@qzc.edu.cn.
Yufen WangZhejiang Qingke Environmental Technology Co, Ltd, 324004, QuzhouZhejiang, China.
Xiaoyong CaoInstitute of Zhejiang University-Quzhou, Quzhou, 324003, Zhejiang, China. caoxy@zju.edu.cn.
Quzhou University · CN

Funding

Lab Open Project KFXM202204Student Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program Q23X001the Program of "Xinmiao"(Potential)Talents in Zhejiang Province 2022R435A002Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China LZY24B030001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contentUbiquitin, a ubiquitous small protein found in all living organisms, is crucial for tagging proteins earmarked for degradation and holds pivotal importance in biomedicine. Protein functionality is intricately linked to its structure. To comprehend the impact of diverse temperatures on ubiquitin protein structure, our study delved into the energy landscape, hydrogen bonding, and overall structural stability of ubiquitin protein at varying temperatures. Through meticulous analysis of root mean square deviation and root mean square fluctuation, we validated the robustness of the simulation conditions employed. Within our simulated system, the bonding energy and electrostatic potential energy exhibited linear augmentation, while the van der Waals energy demonstrated a linear decline. Additionally, our findings highlighted that the α-Helix secondary structure of the ubiquitin protein gradually transitions toward helix destabilization under high-temperature conditions. The secondary structure of ubiquitin protein experiences distinct changes under varying temperatures. The outcomes of our molecular simulations offer a theoretical framework that enhances our comprehension of how temperature impacts the structural stability of ubiquitin protein. These insights contribute not only to a deeper understanding of iniquity's behavior but also hold broader implications in the realm of biomedicine and beyond.

methodsAll the MD simulations were performed using the GROMACS software with GROMOS96 force field and SPC for water. The ubiquitin protein was put in the center of a cubic box with a length of 8 nm, a setting that allowed > 0.8 nm in the minimal distance between the protein surface and the box wall. To remove the possible coordinate collision of the configurations, in the beginning, the steepest descent method was used until the maximum force between atoms was under 100 kJ/mol·nm with a 0.01 nm step size. Minimization was followed by 30 ps of position-restrained MD simulation. The protein was restrained to its initial position, and the solvent was freely equilibrated. The product phase was obtained with the whole system simulated for 10 ns without any restraint using an integral time step of 1 fs with different temperatures. The cutoff for short-range electronic interaction was set to 1.5 nm. The long-range interactions were treated with a particle-mesh Ewald (PME) method with a grid width of 1.2 nm.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationUbiquitinMembrane ProteinsMolecular ConformationTemperatureMembrane ProteinsUbiquitinMolecular dynamics simulationSecondary structureTemperatureUbiquitin protein

Identifiers

PMID38625615
OpenAlexW4394844941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.