Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38625584›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2024

Timing of decompression in central cord syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Luchun Xu, Wenqing Zhong, Chen Liu, He Zhao, Yang Xiong, Shibo Zhou, Yukun Ma, Yongdong Yang, Xing Yu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luchun Xu *Department of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 100700, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Wenqing Zhong *Department of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 100700, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Chen LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 100700, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
He ZhaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 100700, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yang XiongDepartment of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 100700, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Shibo ZhouDepartment of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 100700, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yukun MaDepartment of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 100700, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yongdong YangDepartment of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 100700, Beijing, People's Republic of China. yyd8817@163.com.
Xing YuDepartment of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 100700, Beijing, People's Republic of China. yuxingbucm@163.com.
Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Innovation Project DZMKJCX-2023-010National Natural Science Foundation of the People's Republic of China 81804119National Natural Science Foundation of the People's Republic of China 81973882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study compared the recovery of motor function and the safety of early and delayed surgical intervention in patients with central cord syndrome (CCS).

methodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were employed to retrieve the targeted studies published from inception to February 19, 2023. Comparative studies of early versus delayed surgical decompression in CCS based on American Spinal Injury Association motor score (AMS) recovery, complication rates, and mortality were selected. The statistical analyses were performed using STATA 16.0 and RevMan 5.4.

resultsOur meta-analysis included 13 studies comprising 8424 patients. Results revealed that early surgery improved AMS scores significantly compared with delayed surgery, with an increase in MDs by 7.22 points (95% CI 1.98-12.45; P = 0.007). Additionally, early surgery reduced the complication rates than delayed surgery (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.42-0.67, P < 0.00001). However, no significant difference was observed in mortality between the two groups (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.75-1.26; P = 0.84).

conclusionsEarly surgical decompression for CCS can improve motor function and reduce the incidence of complications without affecting the mortality rate in patients. Future research should focus on investigating and analyzing the optimal window period for early CCS surgery. Additionally, the timing of surgery should be determined based on the patient's condition and available medical resources.

Indexed as

Central Cord SyndromeDecompression, SurgicalHumansRecovery of FunctionTime-to-TreatmentCentral cord syndromeMeta-analysisSpinal cord injurySurgical decompressionTiming of surgery

Identifiers

PMID38625584
OpenAlexW4394845795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.