Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38625538›Full record

ReviewDie Anaesthesiologie2024

[Ventilation concepts under extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)].

Thomas Bluth, Andreas Güldner, Peter M Spieth

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas BluthKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
Andreas GüldnerKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
Peter M SpiethKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland. peter.spieth@ukdd.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is often the last resort for escalation of treatment in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The success of treatment is mainly determined by patient-specific factors, such as age, comorbidities, duration and invasiveness of the pre-existing ventilation treatment as well as the expertise of the treating ECMO center. In particular, the adjustment of mechanical ventilation during ongoing ECMO treatment remains controversial. Although a reduction of invasiveness of mechanical ventilation seems to be reasonable due to physiological considerations, no improvement in outcome has been demonstrated so far for the use of ultraprotective ventilation regimens.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeHumansAcute lung failureInvasiveness of mechanical ventilationMechanical ventilationSpontaneous breathingUltraprotective ventilation

Identifiers

PMID38625538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.