Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38625518›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2024

Infected pancreatic necrosis-Current trends in management.

Jimil Shah, Michael Fernandez Y Viesca, Robert Jagodzinski, Marianna Arvanitakis

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jimil ShahDepartment of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India.
Michael Fernandez Y ViescaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, HUB, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Robert JagodzinskiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tivoli Hospital, La Louviere, Belgium.
Marianna ArvanitakisDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, HUB, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. marianna.arvanitaki@hubruxelles.be.ORCID 0000-0001-7112-4383
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tivoli · BEPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute necrotizing pancreatitis is a common gastrointestinal disease requiring hospitalization and multiple interventions resulting in higher morbidity and mortality. Development of infection in such necrotic tissue is one of the sentinel events in natural history of necrotizing pancreatitis. Infected necrosis develops in around 1/3rd of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis resulting in higher mortality. So, timely diagnosis of infected necrosis using clinical, laboratory and radiological parameters is of utmost importance. Though initial conservative management with antibiotics and organ support system is effective in some patients, a majority of patients still requires drainage of the collection by various modalities. Mode of drainage of infected pancreatic necrosis depends on various factors such as the clinical status of the patient, location and characteristics of collection and availability of the expertise and includes endoscopic, percutaneous and minimally invasive or open surgical approaches. Endoscopic drainage has proved to be a game changer in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis in the last decade with rapid evolution in procedure techniques, development of novel metal stent and dedicated necrosectomy devices for better clinical outcome. Despite widespread adoption of endoscopic transluminal drainage of pancreatic necrosis with excellent clinical outcomes, peripheral collections are still not amenable for endoscopic drainage and in such scenario, the role of percutaneous catheter drainage or minimally invasive surgical necrosectomy cannot be understated. In a nutshell, the management of patients with infected pancreatic necrosis involves a multi-disciplinary team including a gastroenterologist, an intensivist, an interventional radiologist and a surgeon for optimum clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

DrainagePancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingAnti-Bacterial AgentsEndoscopyHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresStentsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAcute pancreatitisBleedingEndoscopic ultrasoundLAMSMortality

Identifiers

PMID38625518
OpenAlexW4394846099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.