Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38625480›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2024

Design, cohort profile and comparison of the KTD-Innov study: a prospective multidimensional biomarker validation study in kidney allograft rejection.

Valentin Goutaudier, Marta Sablik, Maud Racapé, Olivia Rousseau, Benoit Audry, Nassim Kamar, Marc Raynaud, Olivier Aubert, Béatrice Charreau, Emmanuelle Papuchon and 25 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03582436 (Prospective KTD-innov Cohort of Kidney Transplants Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03582436 completednot on this map

Prospective KTD-innov Cohort of Kidney Transplants Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2018 to 2021Enrolled824ConditionsKidney Transplantation, Transplant Rejection, Graft SurvivalArmsKidney transplantation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Detection of Kidney Allograft Rejection Using Urinary Chemokines.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Valentin GoutaudierParis Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration (PITOR), INSERM U970, Université Paris Cité, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France.
Marta SablikParis Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration (PITOR), INSERM U970, Université Paris Cité, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France.
Maud RacapéParis Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration (PITOR), INSERM U970, Université Paris Cité, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France.
Olivia RousseauINSERM UMR 1064, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, ITUN, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Benoit AudryAgence de la Biomédecine, Saint Denis la Plaine, France.
Nassim KamarDepartment of Nephrology-Dialysis-Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Marc RaynaudParis Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration (PITOR), INSERM U970, Université Paris Cité, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France.
Olivier AubertParis Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration (PITOR), INSERM U970, Université Paris Cité, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France.
Béatrice CharreauINSERM UMR 1064, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, ITUN, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Emmanuelle PapuchonINSERM UMR 1064, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, ITUN, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Richard DangerINSERM UMR 1064, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, ITUN, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Laurence LetertreINSERM UMR 1064, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, ITUN, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Lionel CouziDepartment of Nephrology, Transplantation, Dialysis and Apheresis, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Emmanuel MorelonDepartment of Transplantation, Edouard Herriot University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University Lyon, University of Lyon I, Lyon, France.
Moglie Le QuintrecDepartment of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Jean-Luc TaupinImmunology and Histocompatibility Laboratory, Medical Biology Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Eric VicautClinical Trial Unit Hospital, Lariboisière Saint-Louis AP-HP, Paris Cité University, Paris, France.
Christophe LegendreParis Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration (PITOR), INSERM U970, Université Paris Cité, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France.
Hoa Le MaiINSERM UMR 1064, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, ITUN, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Vishnu PotluriDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Bioinformatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Thi-Van-Ha NguyenINSERM UMR 1064, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, ITUN, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Marie-Eliane AzourySebia, Lisses, France.
Alice PinheiroSebia, Lisses, France.
Georges NouadjeSebia, Lisses, France.
Pierre SonigoSebia, Lisses, France.
Dany AnglicheauDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Ineke TiekenEurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Serge VogelaarEurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Christian JacquelinetAgence de la Biomédecine, Saint Denis la Plaine, France.
Peter ReeseDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Bioinformatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Pierre-Antoine GourraudINSERM UMR 1064, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, ITUN, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Sophie BrouardINSERM UMR 1064, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, ITUN, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Carmen LefaucheurParis Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration (PITOR), INSERM U970, Université Paris Cité, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France.
Alexandre LoupyParis Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration (PITOR), INSERM U970, Université Paris Cité, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France. alexandre.loupy@inserm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3388-7747
KTD-Innov Consortium
Inserm · FRSebia (France) · FRAgence de la Biomédecine · FREurotransplant · NLUniversity of Pennsylvania · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRHôpital Saint-Louis · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-17-RHUS-0010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an unmet need for robust and clinically validated biomarkers of kidney allograft rejection. Here we present the KTD-Innov study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03582436), an unselected deeply phenotyped cohort of kidney transplant recipients with a holistic approach to validate the clinical utility of precision diagnostic biomarkers. In 2018-2019, we prospectively enrolled consecutive adult patients who received a kidney allograft at seven French centers and followed them for a year. We performed multimodal phenotyping at follow-up visits, by collecting clinical, biological, immunological, and histological parameters, and analyzing a panel of 147 blood, urinary and kidney tissue biomarkers. The primary outcome was allograft rejection, assessed at each visit according to the international Banff 2019 classification. We evaluated the representativeness of participants by comparing them with patients from French, European, and American transplant programs transplanted during the same period. A total of 733 kidney transplant recipients (64.1% male and 35.9% female) were included during the study. The median follow-up after transplantation was 12.3 months (interquartile range, 11.9-13.1 months). The cumulative incidence of rejection was 9.7% at one year post-transplant. We developed a distributed and secured data repository in compliance with the general data protection regulation. We established a multimodal biomarker biobank of 16,736 samples, including 9331 blood, 4425 urinary and 2980 kidney tissue samples, managed and secured in a collaborative network involving 7 clinical centers, 4 analytical platforms and 2 industrial partners. Patients' characteristics, immune profiles and treatments closely resembled those of 41,238 French, European and American kidney transplant recipients. The KTD-Innov study is a unique holistic and multidimensional biomarker validation cohort of kidney transplant recipients representative of the real-world transplant population. Future findings from this cohort are likely to be robust and generalizable.

Indexed as

BiomarkersGraft RejectionKidney TransplantationAdultCohort StudiesFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTransplant RecipientsBiomarkersBiomarkersCohort profileKidney transplantationRejectionStudy design

Identifiers

PMID38625480
OpenAlexW4394853426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.