ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2024
Performance of postmortem CT in the diagnosis of natural death from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePostmortem CT (PMCT) is used widely to identify the cause of death. However, its diagnostic performance in cases of natural death from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) may be unsatisfactory because the cause tends to be cardiogenic and cannot be detected on PMCT images. We retrospectively investigated the diagnostic performance of PMCT in the diagnosis of natural death from OHCA and compared it to that of unnatural death. MATERIALS AND
methodsOur series included 450 cases; 336 were natural- and 114 were unnatural death cases. Between 2018 and 2022 all underwent non-contrast PMCT to identify the cause of death. Two radiologists reviewed the PMCT images and categorized them as diagnostic (PMCT alone sufficient to determine the cause of death), suggestive (the cause of death was suggested but additional information was needed), and non-diagnostic (the cause of death could not be determined on PMCT images). The diagnostic performance of PMCT was defined by the percentage of diagnosable and suggestive cases and compared between natural- and unnatural death cases. Interobserver agreement for the cause of death on PMCT images was also assessed with the Cohen kappa coefficient of concordance.
resultsThe diagnostic performance of PMCT for the cause of natural- and unnatural deaths from OHCA was 30.3% and 66.6%, respectively (p < 0.01). The interobserver agreement for the cause of natural- and unnatural deaths on PMCT images was very good with kappa value 0.92 and 0.96, respectively.
conclusionAs PMCT identified the cause of natural death by OHCA in only 30% of cases, its diagnostic performance must be improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.