ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2024
Evaluation of the JF5-based Aspergillus galactomannoprotein lateral flow device for diagnosing invasive aspergillosis in cancer patients.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lateral-flow device for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Current diagnostic approach to fungal infection in the critically ill patient.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025Review
- Urbanisation and Lockdown Impact on Airborne Fungal Communities in Tropical Landscapes: A Comparative Study of Urban and Peri-Urban Environments.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Approach to Pneumonia in Immunocompromised Hosts.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCancer patients are at heightened risk for invasive aspergillosis (IA), a condition associated with elevated mortality risk. The JF5-based Aspergillus Galactomannoprotein Lateral Flow Device (AspLFD) offers rapid point-of-care testing (POCT) for IA. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of AspLFD in cancer populations.
methodsThis retrospective study examined cancer patient bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and serum samples collected between September 2021 and January 2023. Both AspLFD and galactomannan (GM) assays were conducted, and the results were analysed by two independent researchers.
resultsThis study included 242 samples from 218 cancer patients, with 58 BALF and 184 serum samples. The overall agreement between AspLFD and GM assay results was 92.1%, with a kappa value of 0.552. AspLFD diagnosed proven/probable IA with a sensitivity and specificity of 91.7% and 95.3%, respectively, whereas GM exhibited sensitivity and specificity values of 83.3% and 93.7%, respectively. There were no statistical differences in the sensitivity and specificity between the two methods (P > 0.05). For serum analyses, AspLFD and GM exhibited similar sensitivity (66.7% vs. 66.7%, P > 0.05) and specificity (98.6% vs. 96.6%, P > 0.05) values. However, the sensitivity of the AspLFD was superior to the GM assay (100% vs. 88.9%) in BALF analyses but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05), with no difference in specificity (83.7% vs. 83.7%, P > 0.05). In the solid-tumour cohort, both the AspLFD and GM assay exhibited high sensitivity (100% for both) and specificity (94.2% vs. 92.8%, P > 0.05).
conclusionThe AspLFD demonstrated good performance in diagnosing IA in cancer patients, especially those with solid tumours. The AspLFD is thus an alternative POCT, particularly when GM evaluations are not readily available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.