Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38625435›Full record

SynthesisHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2024

End-colostomy parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review on laparoscopic and robotic approaches.

G Sarno, B Iacone, A Tedesco, A Gargiulo, A Ranieri, A Giordano, S Tramontano, U Bracale

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair for parastomal hernia using the ePauli technique.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G SarnoGeneral and Emergency Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Salerno Medical School", San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona University Hospital, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Campus di Baronissi (SA), "Gaetano Fucito" Facility, Mercato San Severino (SA), Salerno, Italy. gsarno79@yahoo.it.ORCID 0000-0002-1161-0846
B IaconeGeneral and Emergency Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Salerno Medical School", San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona University Hospital, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Campus di Baronissi (SA), "Gaetano Fucito" Facility, Mercato San Severino (SA), Salerno, Italy.
A TedescoGeneral and Emergency Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Salerno Medical School", San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona University Hospital, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Campus di Baronissi (SA), "Gaetano Fucito" Facility, Mercato San Severino (SA), Salerno, Italy.
A GargiuloGeneral and Emergency Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Salerno Medical School", San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona University Hospital, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Campus di Baronissi (SA), "Gaetano Fucito" Facility, Mercato San Severino (SA), Salerno, Italy.
A RanieriGeneral and Emergency Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Salerno Medical School", San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona University Hospital, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Campus di Baronissi (SA), "Gaetano Fucito" Facility, Mercato San Severino (SA), Salerno, Italy.
A GiordanoGeneral and Emergency Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Salerno Medical School", San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona University Hospital, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Campus di Baronissi (SA), "Gaetano Fucito" Facility, Mercato San Severino (SA), Salerno, Italy.
S TramontanoGeneral and Emergency Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Salerno Medical School", San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona University Hospital, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Campus di Baronissi (SA), "Gaetano Fucito" Facility, Mercato San Severino (SA), Salerno, Italy.
U BracaleGeneral and Emergency Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Salerno Medical School", San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona University Hospital, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Campus di Baronissi (SA), "Gaetano Fucito" Facility, Mercato San Severino (SA), Salerno, Italy.
University of Salerno · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionParastomal hernia (PSH) is the most common and challenging complication after stoma creation, with an estimated 50% incidence 2 years after the index surgery. Mesh repair is the treatment of choice. Laparoscopic and/or robotic approaches allow acceptable outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic literature review from January 2012 to November 2023 was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Embase, PubMed, and Scopus search were performed to select articles dealing with minimally invasive surgical treatment for PSH after end colostomy.

results603 studies were found, and 24 were chosen. When compared to open surgery, laparoscopy showed decreased postoperative complications and recurrence. The main laparoscopic approaches are the keyhole (KH), the Sugarbaker (SB), and the sandwich technique. Continuous improvement in surgery, mesh technology, and surgeons' expertise led to an amelioration of surgical outcome and recurrence rate after repair. Recent studies showed comparable outcomes for SB and KH techniques, while novel surgical approaches have been proposed in an attempt to further increase the operative and long-term results. Reports on PSH robotic repairs are scarce and describe small series results, suggesting a role of the initial learning curve as a risk factor for complications.

conclusionEnd-colostomy PSH surgical repair still represents a challenge for surgeons. Recent evidence has not shown a significant advantage in postoperative complications and recurrence with a specific repair among SB, KH, and sandwich technique. The paucity of data on robotic surgery does not allow to draw definitive conclusion. Further primary, multicentric, and larger cohort studies are needed.

Indexed as

ColostomyHerniorrhaphyLaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresHernia, VentralHumansIncisional HerniaPostoperative ComplicationsSurgical MeshSurgical StomasColostomyLaparoscopicMininvasive surgeryParastomal herniaRobotic

Identifiers

PMID38625435
PMCPMC11249463
OpenAlexW4394844285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.