Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38625432›Full record

ArticleOral radiology2024

Comparison of mandibular morphometric parameters in digital panoramic radiography in gender determination using machine learning.

Hanife Pertek, Mustafa Kamaşak, Soner Kotan, Fatma Pertek Hatipoğlu, Ömer Hatipoğlu, Taha Emre Köse

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oral radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hanife PertekCenter for Nanotechnology & Biomaterials Application and Research (NBUAM), Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mustafa KamaşakComputer and Informatics, Department of Computer Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Soner KotanDepartment of Computer Education and Instructional Technologies, Atatürk Faculty of Education, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Fatma Pertek HatipoğluDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Niğde, Turkey.
Ömer HatipoğluDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Niğde, Turkey. omerhtp@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4628-8551
Taha Emre KöseDepartment of Oral, Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize, Turkey.
Marmara University · TRNiğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi · TRIstanbul Technical University · TRRecep Tayyip Erdoğan University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the usability of morphometric features obtained from mandibular panoramic radiographs in gender determination using machine learning algorithms. MATERIALS AND

methodsHigh-resolution radiographs of 200 patients aged 20-77 (41.0 ± 12.7) were included in the study. Twelve different morphometric measurements were extracted from each digital panoramic radiography included in the study. These measurements were used as features in the machine learning phase in which six different machine learning algorithms were used (k-nearest neighbor, decision trees, support vector machines, naive Bayes, linear discrimination analysis, and neural networks). To evaluate the reliability, we have performed tenfold cross-validation and we repeated this 10 times for every classification process. This process enhances the reliability of the results for other datasets.

resultsWhen all 12 features are used together, the accuracy rate is found to be 82.6 ± 0.5%. The classification accuracies are also compared using each feature alone. Three features that give the highest accuracy are coronoid height (80.9 ± 0.9%), condyle height (78.2 ± 0.5%), and ramus height (77.2 ± 0.4%), respectively. When compared to the classification algorithms, the highest accuracy was obtained with the naive Bayes algorithm with a rate of 84.0 ± 0.4%.

conclusionMachine learning techniques can accurately determine gender by analyzing mandibular morphometric structures from digital panoramic radiographs. The most precise results are achieved by evaluating the structures in combination, using attributes obtained from applying the MRMR algorithm to all features.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMandibleRadiography, PanoramicAdultAgedAlgorithmsBayes TheoremFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSex Determination by SkeletonYoung AdultDigital panoramic radiographyForensic scienceGender determinationİmage processingMachine learningMandibular morphometric parameters

Identifiers

PMID38625432
OpenAlexW4394850420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.