ReviewMaxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery2024
Advancements in alveolar bone grafting and ridge preservation: a narrative review on materials, techniques, and clinical outcomes.
Review in Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative evaluation of porcine and bovine bone xenografts in bone grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Pooled it
- Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Graft With High Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid in Ridge Preservation: Pilot Trial.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2025Trial
- Effect of hUCMSC-seeded hydroxyapatite-chitosan scaffolds on immunomodulatory cytokine expression during alveolar socket healing: an in vivo study.Odontology · 2026Article
- Effect of aging on healing of mandibular tooth extraction socket in a rat model.European journal of oral sciences · 2026Article
- Alveolar socket preservation with human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-seeded hydroxyapatite-chitosan scaffolds: An in vivo assessment of osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB expression.Journal of molecular histology · 2026Article
- Definite Implant Position as Novel Readout for Effectiveness of Ridge Preservation Indicates to Beneficial Effect of Combined Treatment with Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) and Xenogenic Biomaterial in Bone Regeneration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Socket Preservation Technique Using Allogeneic and Xenogeneic Materials: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Post-Market Non-Controlled Study on the Clinical Safety of a Synthetic Calcium Phosphate Ceramic in Alveolar Bone Regeneration: A 6-Month Prospective Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Standardized Photobiomodulation Dosimetry Targeting the Base of Calvarial Critical-Sized Defects for Bone Regeneration: A Preclinical RCT Comparing Flattop vs. Gaussian Beam Profiles, with or Without Bio-OssJournal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Dental pulp stem cells and hydroxyapatite: a promising combination for maxillary bone regeneration.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Optimizing Alveolar Ridge Preservation and GBR: A Systematic Review of Membranes, Grafts, and Soft Tissue Strategies for Personalized Care.International journal of dentistry · 2026Review
- Vitamin D-Loaded Chitosan Nanostructures for Bone Regeneration: A Combined In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation in an Osteoporotic Rat Model.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- L-Serine-Incorporated Collagen Scaffolds for Modulating In Vivo Degradation Behavior.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Clinical Efficacy of Allogeneic Bone Plate Shell Technique for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Article
- An Evaluation of Osseointegration Outcomes Around Trabecular Metal Implants in Human Maxillaries Reconstructed with Allograft and Platelet-Rich Fibrin.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Efficacy of Cross-Linked Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration: In Vitro and Clinical Studies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Patient reported pain following tooth extraction with different autologous platelet concentrates. Systematic review.BDJ open · 2025Article
- Nonessential amino acid is not nonessential in geriatric patients: implications for maxillofacial wound healing and bone repair.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2025Review
- Bioglasses Versus Bioactive Calcium Phosphate Derivatives as Advanced Ceramics in Tissue Engineering: Comparative and Comprehensive Study, Current Trends, and Innovative Solutions.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review systematically explores the progression of materials and techniques in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP). We commence by delineating the evolution from traditional ARP methods to cutting-edge alternatives, including platelet-rich fibrin, injectable bone repair materials, and hydrogel systems. Critical examination of various studies reveals these innovative approaches not only accelerate bone healing but also significantly improve patient-reported outcomes, such as satisfaction, pain perception, and overall quality of life. Emphasis is placed on the correlation between advanced ARP techniques and enhanced patient comfort and clinical efficacy, underscoring their transformative potential in dental implantology. Highlighting the effectiveness of ARP, the implant survival rate over a span of 5 to 7 years was high, showcasing the reliability and success of these methods. Further, patients expressed high aesthetic satisfaction with the soft tissue outcome, evidenced by an average visual analog scale (VAS) score of 94. This positive aesthetic appraisal is linked to the clinical health of implants, potentially due to the employment of tooth-supported surgical guides. The economic analysis reveals a varied cost range for bone graft substitutes ($46.2 to $140) and socket sealing materials ($12 to $189), with a noteworthy correlation between the investment in barrier membranes and the diminished horizontal and vertical ridge resorption. This suggests that membrane usage significantly contributes to preserving ridge dimensions, offering a cost-effective strategy for enhancing ARP outcomes. In conclusion, this review illuminates the significant advancements in ARP, highlighting the shift towards innovative materials and techniques that not only promise enhanced bone regeneration and reduced healing times but also improve patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcomes. The documented high implant survival rate and the beneficial economic implications of membrane use further validate the effectiveness of contemporary ARP strategies, paving the way for their broader adoption in dental implantology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.