Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38625364›Full record

ReviewEvolving systems2023

A survey on recent trends in deep learning for nucleus segmentation from histopathology images.

Anusua Basu, Pradip Senapati, Mainak Deb, Rebika Rai, Krishna Gopal Dhal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evolving systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anusua BasuDepartment of Computer Science and Application, Midnapore College (Autonomous), Paschim Medinipur, Midnapore, West Bengal India.
Pradip SenapatiDepartment of Computer Science and Application, Midnapore College (Autonomous), Paschim Medinipur, Midnapore, West Bengal India.
Mainak DebWipro Technologies, Pune, Maharashtra India.
Rebika RaiDepartment of Computer Applications, Sikkim University, Sikkim, India.
Krishna Gopal DhalDepartment of Computer Science and Application, Midnapore College (Autonomous), Paschim Medinipur, Midnapore, West Bengal India.ORCID 0000-0002-6748-0569

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleus segmentation is an imperative step in the qualitative study of imaging datasets, considered as an intricate task in histopathology image analysis. Segmenting a nucleus is an important part of diagnosing, staging, and grading cancer, but overlapping regions make it hard to separate and tell apart independent nuclei. Deep Learning is swiftly paving its way in the arena of nucleus segmentation, attracting quite a few researchers with its numerous published research articles indicating its efficacy in the field. This paper presents a systematic survey on nucleus segmentation using deep learning in the last five years (2017-2021), highlighting various segmentation models (U-Net, SCPP-Net, Sharp U-Net, and LiverNet) and exploring their similarities, strengths, datasets utilized, and unfolding research areas.

Indexed as

Cancer diagnosisConvolutional neural networkDeep learningDeep neural networkHematology image segmentationHistopathology image segmentationImage segmentationMachine learningNeural networkNucleus segmentationPathology image segmentationWhite blood cell segmentation

Identifiers

PMID38625364
PMCPMC9987406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.