Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38625306›Full record

ArticleReview of evolutionary political economy2023

Policy innovation for sustainable development: the case of the Amazon Fund.

João Carlos Ferraz, Juliana Santiago, Luma Ramos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Review of evolutionary political economy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

João Carlos FerrazUniversidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5980-2591
Juliana SantiagoUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, United States.
Luma RamosBoston University, Global Development Policy Center, Boston, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For its "long, winding roads (Thanks, The Beatles!)" and unknown challenges, fostering sustainable and inclusive development requires new public intervention models. For that, the critical assessment of existing innovative policy experiments, their outcomes and determinants, is important not only to strengthen our knowledge base but also to inspire sound development-oriented policies, including green industrial policies. Based on an experimental analytical framework, this article analyses an original policy instrument in Brazil, the Amazon Fund (AF), during the 2008-2021 period. This article demonstrates that the Fund's positive impacts on sustainable development are largely due to its three interconnected innovative dimensions (multistakeholder governance, donor-based pay-for-performance funding, and non-reimbursable financing of projects by the Brazilian Development Bank, BNDES). With hindsight, the article sheds light on the fundamental role of political decisions and the vital role played by different stakeholders in shaping or reversing the works of policy design, making, and implementation.

Indexed as

Amazon FundDevelopment financeIndustrial policyMultistakeholder governancePolicy innovationSustainable development

Identifiers

PMID38625306
PMCPMC9951141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.