Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38625305›Full record

ArticleAnnals of data science2022

Performances of Machine Learning Models for Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease.

Siddhartha Kumar Arjaria, Abhishek Singh Rathore, Dhananjay Bisen, Sanjib Bhattacharyya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of data science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Siddhartha Kumar ArjariaRajkiya Engineering College, Banda, India.
Abhishek Singh RathoreShri Vaishnav Vidyapeeth Vishwavidyalaya, Indore, India.
Dhananjay BisenDepartment of Information Technology, Madhav Institute of Technology and Science, Gwalior, India.
Sanjib BhattacharyyaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Science and Chinese Traditional Medicine, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

Smartphone-Based "Burst" Cognitive AssessmentsP01AG003991 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Tammie Lee Smith Benzinger · 1985 to 2026
$69.5M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH CENTERP50AG005681 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, JOHN · 1985 to 2019
$52.1M
The natural history of AB accumulation in preclinical ADP01AG026276 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHINDLER, SUZANNE ELIZABETH · 2005 to 2025
$49.5M
MORPHOMETRY BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS RESEARCH NETWORKU24RR021382 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROSEN, BRUCE R · 2004 to 2008
$24.1M
STRUCTURE, FUNCTION AND COGNITION IN SCHIZOPHRENIAP50MH071616 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARCH, DEANNA · 2004 to 2008
$11.2M
Functional-anatomic exploration of cognitive controlR01AG021910 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BUCKNER, RANDY L · 2005 to 2009
$1.2M
NCRR NIH HHS U24 RR021382NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003991NIA NIH HHS P01 AG026276NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005681NIA NIH HHS R01 AG021910NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH071616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent times, various machine learning approaches have been widely employed for effective diagnosis and prediction of diseases like cancer, thyroid, Covid-19, etc. Likewise, Alzheimer's (AD) is also one progressive malady that destroys memory and cognitive function over time. Unfortunately, there are no dedicated AI-based solutions for diagnoses of AD to go hand in hand with medical diagnosis, even though multiple factors contribute to the diagnosis, making AI a very viable supplementary diagnostic solution. This paper reports an endeavor to apply various machine learning algorithms like SGD, k-Nearest Neighbors, Logistic Regression, Decision tree, Random Forest, AdaBoost, Neural Network, SVM, and Naïve Bayes on the dataset of affected victims to diagnose Alzheimer's disease. Longitudinal collections of subjects from OASIS dataset have been used for prediction. Moreover, some feature selection and dimension reduction methods like Information Gain, Information Gain Ratio, Gini index, Chi-Squared, and PCA are applied to rank different factors and identify the optimum number of factors from the dataset for disease diagnosis. Furthermore, performance is evaluated of each classifier in terms of ROC-AUC, accuracy, F1 score, recall, and precision as well as included comparative analysis between algorithms. Our study suggests that approximately 90% classification accuracy is observed under top-rated four features CDR, SES, nWBV, and EDUC.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseClassification algorithmsData scienceFeature selectionMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38625305
PMCPMC9574175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.