Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38625165›Full record

ArticleAnnals of data science2023

Jump-Drop Adjusted Prediction of Cumulative Infected Cases Using the Modified SIS Model.

Rashi Mohta, Sravya Prathapani, Palash Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of data science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rashi Mohta *Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam India.
Sravya Prathapani *Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam India.
Palash GhoshDepartment of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam India.ORCID 0000-0001-9605-1213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of cumulative COVID-19 infected cases is essential for effectively managing the limited healthcare resources in India. Historically, epidemiological models have helped in controlling such epidemics. Models require accurate historical data to predict future outcomes. In our data, there were days exhibiting erratic, apparently anomalous jumps and drops in the number of daily reported COVID-19 infected cases that did not conform with the overall trend. Including those observations in the training data would most likely worsen model predictive accuracy. However, with existing epidemiological models it is not straightforward to determine, for a specific day, whether or not an outcome should be considered anomalous. In this work, we propose an algorithm to automatically identify anomalous 'jump' and 'drop' days, and then based upon the overall trend, the number of daily infected cases for those days is adjusted and the training data is amended using the adjusted observations. We applied the algorithm in conjunction with a recently proposed, modified Susceptible-Infected-Susceptible (SIS) model to demonstrate that prediction accuracy is improved after adjusting training data counts for apparent erratic anomalous jumps and drops.

Indexed as

AdjustmentCOVID-19Epidemiological modelsJumps and dropsModified SIS model

Identifiers

PMID38625165
PMCPMC10184638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.