ArticleAnnals of data science2023
Jump-Drop Adjusted Prediction of Cumulative Infected Cases Using the Modified SIS Model.
Article in Annals of data science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of cumulative COVID-19 infected cases is essential for effectively managing the limited healthcare resources in India. Historically, epidemiological models have helped in controlling such epidemics. Models require accurate historical data to predict future outcomes. In our data, there were days exhibiting erratic, apparently anomalous jumps and drops in the number of daily reported COVID-19 infected cases that did not conform with the overall trend. Including those observations in the training data would most likely worsen model predictive accuracy. However, with existing epidemiological models it is not straightforward to determine, for a specific day, whether or not an outcome should be considered anomalous. In this work, we propose an algorithm to automatically identify anomalous 'jump' and 'drop' days, and then based upon the overall trend, the number of daily infected cases for those days is adjusted and the training data is amended using the adjusted observations. We applied the algorithm in conjunction with a recently proposed, modified Susceptible-Infected-Susceptible (SIS) model to demonstrate that prediction accuracy is improved after adjusting training data counts for apparent erratic anomalous jumps and drops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.