Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38624785›Full record

ArticleGranular computing2022

Pythagorean fuzzy entropy measure-based complex proportional assessment technique for solving multi-criteria healthcare waste treatment problem.

Rishikesh Chaurasiya, Divya Jain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Granular computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rishikesh ChaurasiyaDepartment of Mathematics, Jaypee University of Engineering and Technology, Guna, Madhya Pradesh India.
Divya JainDepartment of Mathematics, Jaypee University of Engineering and Technology, Guna, Madhya Pradesh India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing risk to human health and environmental issues, the selection of appropriate management and treatment of healthcare waste has become a major problem, especially in developing countries. There are various alternatives to dispose of health care waste. The important is to assess the best alternative among them. The assessment of each alternative should be done based on public health, psychological, economic, environmental, technological, and operational aspect. The selection of the best health care waste treatment (HCWT) alternative is a complicated, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem involving numerous disparate qualitative and quantitative features. Hence, in this research article, the MCDM method is presented for estimating and choosing the best alternative of HCWT by COPRAS technique in a Pythagorean fuzzy set (PFS). Here, in this paper, first of all, a new entropy measure on PFSs is proposed and its validity is studied. Thereafter, the MCDM technique Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) is discussed in which the criteria weights are assessed by the proposed entropy measure and score function to enhance an efficacy and efficiency of the proposed technique. Furthermore, the above-defined technique is employed to resolve the real-life problem to obtain the best treatment alternative to disposal of the health care waste. Finally, sensitivity analysis is presented to rationale the proposed viewpoint for prioritizing HCWT alternatives.

Indexed as

Health care waste treatmentIntuitionistic fuzzy setPF-COPRASPythagorean fuzzy set

Identifiers

PMID38624785
PMCPMC8723817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.