Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38624595›Full record

ArticleEuropean transport research review2021

Impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the mobility behaviour in Germany.

Juliane Anke, Angela Francke, Lisa-Marie Schaefer, Tibor Petzoldt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European transport research review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The impact of COVID-19 on mobility choices in Switzerland.Transportation research. Part A, Policy and practice · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and government intervention on active mobility.Transportation research. Part A, Policy and practice · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juliane AnkeTechnische Universität Dresden, Traffic and Transportation Psychology, 01062 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4494-4682
Angela FranckeTechnische Universität Dresden, Traffic and Transportation Psychology, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
Lisa-Marie SchaeferTechnische Universität Dresden, Traffic and Transportation Psychology, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
Tibor PetzoldtTechnische Universität Dresden, Traffic and Transportation Psychology, 01062 Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and the measures taken to combat it led to severe constraints for various areas of life, including mobility. To study the effects of this disruptive situation on the mobility behaviour of entire subgroups, and how they shape their mobility in reaction to the special circumstances, can help to better understand, how people react to external changes. Methodology: Aim of the study presented in this article was to investigate to what extent, how and in what areas mobility behaviour has changed during the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in Germany. In addition, a focus was put on the comparison of federal states with and without lockdown in order to investigate a possible contribution of this measure to changes in mobility. We asked respondents via an online survey about their trip purposes and trip frequency, their choice of transport mode and the reasons for choosing it in the context of the COVID-19 crisis. For the analyses presented in this paper, we used the data of 4157survey participants (2512 without lockdown, 1645 with lockdown). Results: The data confirmed a profound impact on the mobility behaviour with a shift away from public transport and increases in car usage, walking and cycling. Comparisons of federal states with and without lockdown revealed only isolated differences. It seems that, even if the lockdown had some minor effects, its role in the observed behavioural changes was minimal.

Indexed as

CoronaCOVID-19Mobility behaviourMode choicePandemicSARS-CoV-2Transport

Identifiers

PMID38624595
PMCPMC7835317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.