Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38624218›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of heredity2024

Missing history of a modern domesticate: Historical demographics and genetic diversity in farm-bred red fox populations.

Halie M Rando, Emmarie P Alexander, Sophie Preckler-Quisquater, Cate B Quinn, Jeremy T Stutchman, Jennifer L Johnson, Estelle R Bastounes, Beata Horecka, Kristina L Black, Michael P Robson and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of heredity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Halie M RandoDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7688-1770
Emmarie P AlexanderDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8912-7048
Sophie Preckler-QuisquaterMammalian Ecology and Conservation Unit, Veterinary Genetics Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8885-5297
Cate B QuinnMammalian Ecology and Conservation Unit, Veterinary Genetics Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7685-362X
Jeremy T StutchmanDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, United States.
Jennifer L JohnsonDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3339-4419
Estelle R BastounesDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, United States.
Beata HoreckaFaculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, Institute of Biological Basis of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0997-9684
Kristina L BlackDepartment of Forestry and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, United States.
Michael P RobsonDepartment of Computer Science, Smith College, Northampton, MA 01063, United States.
Darya V ShepelevaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Yury E HerbeckInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Anastasiya V KharlamovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Lyudmila N TrutInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Jonathan N PauliDepartment of Forestry and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5908-6628
Benjamin N SacksMammalian Ecology and Conservation Unit, Veterinary Genetics Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0143-6589
Anna V KukekovaDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7027-3715
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USInstitute of Cytology and Genetics · RUUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILRocky Mountain Research Station · USSmith College · USUniversity of Life Sciences in Lublin · PL

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms of Social BehaviorR35GM144276 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ANNA KUKEKOVA · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM144276NIH HHS GM144276Russian Science Foundation 21-44-04405USDA Hatch Project 538922
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first record of captive-bred red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) dates to 1896 when a breeding enterprise emerged in the provinces of Atlantic Canada. Because its domestication happened during recent history, the red fox offers a unique opportunity to examine the genetic diversity of an emerging domesticated species in the context of documented historical and economic influences. In particular, the historical record suggests that North American and Eurasian farm-bred populations likely experienced different demographic trajectories. Here, we focus on the likely impacts of founder effects and genetic drift given historical trends in fox farming on North American and Eurasian farms. A total of 15 mitochondrial haplotypes were identified in 369 foxes from 10 farm populations that we genotyped (n = 161) or that were previously published. All haplotypes are endemic to North America. Although most haplotypes were consistent with eastern Canadian ancestry, a small number of foxes carried haplotypes typically found in Alaska and other regions of western North America. The presence of these haplotypes supports historical reports of wild foxes outside of Atlantic Canada being introduced into the breeding stock. These putative Alaskan and Western haplotypes were more frequently identified in Eurasian farms compared to North American farms, consistent with historical documentation suggesting that Eurasian economic and breeding practices were likely to maintain low-frequency haplotypes more effectively than in North America. Contextualizing inter- vs. intra-farm genetic diversity alongside the historical record is critical to understanding the origins of this emerging domesticate and the relationships between wild and farm-bred fox populations.

Indexed as

FoxesGenetic VariationHaplotypesAnimalsAnimals, DomesticBreedingCanadaDNA, MitochondrialDomesticationFarmsFounder EffectGenetic DriftGenetics, PopulationDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID38624218
PMCPMC11235124
OpenAlexW4394853266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.