Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38624201›Full record

ArticleAsian journal of andrology2024

Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy for cancer detection in patients with gray-zone prostate-specific antigen: a multicenter, real-world study.

Jun-Xiao Liu, Ze-Yuan Wang, Shao-Xi Niu, Xiao-Yong Sai, Xu Zhang, Xue-Pei Zhang, Xin Ma

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Asian journal of andrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jun-Xiao LiuThe Graduate School, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Ze-Yuan WangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Shao-Xi NiuDepartment of Urology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Xiao-Yong SaiFaculty of Epidemiology and Statistics, The Graduate School, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Xu ZhangDepartment of Urology, The Third Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Xue-Pei ZhangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Xin MaDepartment of Urology, The Third Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge about the effect of different prostate biopsy approaches on the prostate cancer detection rate (CDR) in patients with gray-zone prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is limited. We performed this study to compare the CDR among patients who underwent different biopsy approaches and had rising PSA levels in the gray zone. Two hundred and twenty-two patients who underwent transrectal prostate biopsy (TRB) and 216 patients who underwent transperineal prostate biopsy (TPB) between June 2016 and September 2022 were reviewed in this study. In addition, 110 patients who received additional targeted biopsies following the systematic TPB were identified. Clinical parameters, including age, PSA derivative, prostate volume (PV), and needle core count, were recorded. The data were fitted via propensity score matching (PSM), adjusting for potential confounders. TPB outperformed TRB in terms of the CDR (49.6% vs 28.3%, P = 0.001). The clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rate was not significantly different between TPB and TRB (78.6% vs 68.8%, P = 0.306). In stratified analysis, TPB outperformed TRB in CDR when the age of patients was 65-75 years (59.0% vs 22.0%, P < 0.001), when PV was 25.00-50.00 ml (63.2% vs 28.3%, P < 0.001), and when needle core count was no more than 12 (58.5% vs 31.5%, P = 0.005). The CDR ( P = 0.712) and detection rate of csPCa ( P = 0.993) did not significantly differ among the systematic, targeted, and combined biopsies. TPB outperformed TRB in CDR for patients with gray-zone PSA. Moreover, performing target biopsy after systematic TPB provided no additional benefits in CDR.

Indexed as

ProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsAgedBiopsyBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedPerineumRectumRetrospective StudiesProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID38624201
PMCPMC11280212
OpenAlexW4394852995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.