Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38623838›Full record

ArticleThoracic cancer2024

Efficacy and safety of novel immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combinations versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A network meta-analysis.

Chuang Yang, Tiantian Xuan, Qing Gong, Xin Dai, Chengjun Wang, Rongyu Zhang, Wen Zhao, Jian Wang, Weiming Yue, Jisheng Li

Open access · goldAbstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chuang YangQilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Tiantian XuanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Qingdao, China.
Qing GongDepartment of Respiratory Oncology, Wendeng District People's Hospital, Weihai, China.
Xin DaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Shandong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Chengjun WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Rongyu ZhangQilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Wen ZhaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Jian WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7620-6740
Weiming YueDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Jisheng LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4186-6228
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University · CNQingdao University · CNShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNWenzhou Central Hospital · CN

Funding

Health Field Related Research Exchange Program 2-26Hui Lan Public Welfare Foudation Project HLZY20231128001Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2020LZL018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have an exceptionally poor prognosis and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with etoposide-platinum is recommended as standard first-line therapy. However, which combination pattern is the best still remains unknown. This network meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of currently available patterns including an antiangiogenic agent containing regimen and probed into the most appropriate therapy for patients.

methodsHazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) were generated using R software. The outcomes of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events of grade 3 or higher (grade ≥ 3 adverse events [AEs]) were analyzed.

resultsA total of 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 5544 patients were included for analysis. Drug combination patterns included adebrelimab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, serplulimab, benmelstobart plus anlotinib, tislelizumab, tiragolumab plus atezolizumab and toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy. The novel antiangiogenic agent containing regimen benmelstobart + anlotinib + chemotherapy showed the highest possibility to present the best PFS and OS versus chemotherapy. Compared with ICI plus chemotherapy, it also achieved significantly better PFS and presented a tendency of OS benefit. As for safety and toxicity, patients treated with benmelstobart + anlotinib + chemotherapy and durvalumab + tremelimumab + chemotherapy suffered a higher likelihood of more grade ≥ 3 AEs without unexpected AEs.

conclusionPD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors-based combinations are associated with significant improvement in both PFS and OS for treatment-naïve ES-SCLC patients. Benmelstobart plus anlotinib with chemotherapy (CT) yielded better survival benefit versus CT alone or other ICIs + CT with caution for more adverse effects along with the addition of an antiangiogenic agent.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLung NeoplasmsSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsangiogenesischemotherapyimmunologynetwork meta‐analysissmall cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID38623838
PMCPMC11128374
OpenAlexW4394853618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.