Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38623717›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2024

Positive Emotional Responses to Socially Assistive Robots in People With Dementia: Pilot Study.

Eri Otaka, Aiko Osawa, Kenji Kato, Yota Obayashi, Shintaro Uehara, Masaki Kamiya, Katsuhiro Mizuno, Shusei Hashide, Izumi Kondo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eri OtakaLaboratory of Practical Technology in Community, Assistive Robot Center, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology Research Institute, Obu, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0888-9241
Aiko OsawaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5767-2866
Kenji KatoLaboratory of Clinical Evaluation with Robotics, Assistive Robot Center, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology Research Institute, Obu, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9417-6685
Yota ObayashiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6358-5435
Shintaro UeharaFaculty of Rehabilitation, Fujita Health University School of Health Sciences, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6255-1815
Masaki KamiyaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7827-3530
Katsuhiro MizunoDepartment of Physical Rehabilitation, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9324-495X
Shusei HashideDepartment of Physical Rehabilitation, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0004-4605-2671
Izumi KondoAssistive Robot Center, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology Research Institute, Obu, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1675-7310

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Interventions and care that can evoke positive emotions and reduce apathy or agitation are important for people with dementia. In recent years, socially assistive robots used for better dementia care have been found to be feasible. However, the immediate responses of people with dementia when they are given multiple sensory modalities from socially assistive robots have not yet been sufficiently elucidated. Objective: This study aimed to quantitatively examine the immediate emotional responses of people with dementia to stimuli presented by socially assistive robots using facial expression analysis in order to determine whether they elicited positive emotions. Methods: This pilot study adopted a single-arm interventional design. Socially assistive robots were presented to nursing home residents in a three-step procedure: (1) the robot was placed in front of participants (visual stimulus), (2) the robot was manipulated to produce sound (visual and auditory stimuli), and (3) participants held the robot in their hands (visual, auditory, and tactile stimuli). Expression intensity values for "happy," "sad," "angry," "surprised," "scared," and "disgusted" were calculated continuously using facial expression analysis with FaceReader. Additionally, self-reported feelings were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. In addition to the comparison between the subjective and objective emotional assessments, expression intensity values were compared across the aforementioned 3 stimuli patterns within each session. Finally, the expression intensity value for "happy" was compared between the different types of robots. Results: A total of 29 participants (mean age 88.7, SD 6.2 years; n=27 female; Japanese version of Mini-Mental State Examination mean score 18.2, SD 5.1) were recruited. The expression intensity value for "happy" was the largest in both the subjective and objective assessments and increased significantly when all sensory modalities (visual, auditory, and tactile) were presented (median expression intensity 0.21, IQR 0.09-0.35) compared to the other 2 patterns (visual alone: median expression intensity 0.10, IQR 0.03-0.22; P<.001; visual and auditory: median expression intensity 0.10, IQR 0.04-0.23; P<.001). The comparison of different types of robots revealed a significant increase when all stimuli were presented by doll-type and animal-type robots, but not humanoid-type robots. Conclusions: By quantifying the emotional responses of people with dementia, this study highlighted that socially assistive robots may be more effective in eliciting positive emotions when multiple sensory stimuli, including tactile stimuli, are involved. More studies, including randomized controlled trials, are required to further explore the effectiveness of using socially assistive robots in dementia care.

Indexed as

DementiaRoboticsAged, 80 and overEmotionsFemaleHappinessHumansPilot Projectsdementia careemotionexpression intensityfacial expressiongerontechnologygerontologylong-term careroboticssensory modality

Identifiers

PMID38623717
PMCPMC11034362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.