Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38623561›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024

Federated attention consistent learning models for prostate cancer diagnosis and Gleason grading.

Fei Kong, Xiyue Wang, Jinxi Xiang, Sen Yang, Xinran Wang, Meng Yue, Jun Zhang, Junhan Zhao, Xiao Han, Yuhan Dong and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Histolytics: A panoptic spatial analysis framework for interpretable histopathology.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A review on federated learning in computational pathology.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Fei KongShenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Xiyue WangCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China.
Jinxi XiangAI Lab, Tencent, Shenzhen, 518057, China.
Sen YangAI Lab, Tencent, Shenzhen, 518057, China.
Xinran WangDepartment of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050035, China.
Meng YueDepartment of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050035, China.
Jun ZhangAI Lab, Tencent, Shenzhen, 518057, China.
Junhan ZhaoMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, United States.
Xiao HanAI Lab, Tencent, Shenzhen, 518057, China.
Yuhan DongShenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Biyue ZhuDepartment of Pharmacy, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400014, China.
Fang WangDepartment of Pathology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, 264000, China.
Yueping LiuDepartment of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050035, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant promise in transforming medical imaging, enhancing diagnostics, and refining treatment strategies. However, the reliance on extensive multicenter datasets for training AI models poses challenges due to privacy concerns. Federated learning provides a solution by facilitating collaborative model training across multiple centers without sharing raw data. This study introduces a federated attention-consistent learning (FACL) framework to address challenges associated with large-scale pathological images and data heterogeneity. FACL enhances model generalization by maximizing attention consistency between local clients and the server model. To ensure privacy and validate robustness, we incorporated differential privacy by introducing noise during parameter transfer. We assessed the effectiveness of FACL in cancer diagnosis and Gleason grading tasks using 19,461 whole-slide images of prostate cancer from multiple centers. In the diagnosis task, FACL achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9718, outperforming seven centers with an average AUC of 0.9499 when categories are relatively balanced. For the Gleason grading task, FACL attained a Kappa score of 0.8463, surpassing the average Kappa score of 0.7379 from six centers. In conclusion, FACL offers a robust, accurate, and cost-effective AI training model for prostate cancer pathology while maintaining effective data safeguards.

Indexed as

Attention mechanismCancer detectionConsistent learningFederated learningHistopathology

Identifiers

PMID38623561
PMCPMC11016961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.