ArticleClinical epidemiology and global health2024
Field validation of an app based developmental and speech language screening (SRESHT screener) conducted by grass root workers.
Article in Clinical epidemiology and global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study validated an app-based developmental and speech language screening (SRESHT screener) conducted by Grass Roots Workers (GRWs) among children below six years of age in a rural community in the state of Tamil Nadu (the field). Method: The study was carried out in two phases, first the training of GRWs and then the validation of the screening conducted by them using the app. For the training, suitable materials were developed, and the GRW's knowledge and skills were evaluated pre- and post-training. Two closed-ended questionnaires were used to evaluate the GRWs' knowledge about the screening tools. The Observed Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) method was used to evaluate their skill. All the participants were selected by convenience sampling and were screened independently by both a Speech Language Pathologist (SLP) and a GRW using the application. Cohen's kappa and percent agreement were used to determine agreement in screening results between the SLP and GRWs. Results: All the GRWs scored at least 75 % and above in both the knowledge and skill assessments conducted post-training. "Substantial agreement" on kappa-based extent of agreement and "almost perfect" agreement on percent agreement were obtained between GRWs and SLP for the app-based screening. Conclusion: The findings of this study imply that the app-based developmental and speech language screening performed in the community by GRWs is valid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.