Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38623496›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Comparative analysis of

Sandra María Marulanda-Moreno, Clara Inés Saldamando-Benjumea, Rafael Vivero Gomez, Gloria Cadavid-Restrepo, Claudia Ximena Moreno-Herrera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. GlobalISME communications · 2026
    Article
  3. Gut Bacteria Strategies ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandra María Marulanda-Moreno *Grupo de Microbiodiversidad y Bioprospección-Microbiop, Departamento de Biociencias, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Medellín, Colombia.
Clara Inés Saldamando-BenjumeaGrupo de Biotecnología Vegetal UNALMED-CIB. Línea en Ecología y Evolución de Insectos, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-9368-8200
Rafael Vivero GomezGrupo de Microbiodiversidad y Bioprospección-Microbiop, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Medellín, Colombia.
Gloria Cadavid-RestrepoGrupo de Microbiodiversidad y Bioprospección-Microbiop, Departamento de Biociencias, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Medellín, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-1026-6358
Claudia Ximena Moreno-Herrera *Grupo de Microbiodiversidad y Bioprospección-Microbiop, Departamento de Biociencias, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Medellín, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-8132-5223
Universidad Nacional de Colombia · CO

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencias y Tecnología
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methods: The composition of microbiota during the life cycle of the FAW corn and rice strains was analyzed through high-throughput sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene using the MiSeq system. Additionally, culture-dependent techniques were used to isolate gut bacteria and the Transcribed Internal Spacer-ITS, 16S rRNA, and Results: Richness, diversity, and bacterial composition changed significantly across the life cycle of FAW. Most diversity was observed in eggs and males. Differences in gut microbiota diversity between CS and RS were minor. However,

Indexed as

Bacillus thuringiensisMicrobiotaOryzaAnimalsLarvaLife Cycle StagesMaleRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSpodopteraZea maysRNA, Ribosomal, 16SArsenophonusCultured bacteriaEnterococcus mundtiiFAWHigh-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA geneLife cycleSpiroplasma

Identifiers

PMID38623496
PMCPMC11017975
OpenAlexW4394755951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.