ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2024
Tranexamic acid for management of heavy vaginal bleeding: barriers to access and myths surrounding its use.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of coagulation disorders and iron deficiency in women with heavy menstrual bleeding.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Prophylaxis for von Willebrand disease: Is it time for parity with established practice in hemophilia A?Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2026Review
- Prevalence and risk factors of heavy menstrual bleeding in Africa: a narrative review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Uses of tranexamic acid and the risk of thrombosis in women: Number 11 - 2025.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tranexamic acid is safe and effective for the treatment of heavy vaginal bleeding during menstruation and childbirth. It improves the quality of life, facilitates participation in school and work, and reduces the risk of death from postpartum hemorrhage. Despite its well-established benefits, individual- and structural-level barriers preclude its widespread utilization, hindering effective patient care and perpetuating health inequities in women's health. We first describe the evidence for the use of tranexamic acid in treating heavy menstrual bleeding and postpartum hemorrhage. Barriers to tranexamic acid use, including structural sexism, period poverty, misinformation in product monograph labeling, stigmatization of vaginal blood loss, and drug access, are then discussed. Finally, we summarize relevant data presented during the 2023 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.