ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Superficial Intramuscular Gluteal Lipograft by Doppler Ultrasound: A Report of 24 Patients.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reply to the Discussion on: Superficial Intramuscular Gluteal Lipograft by Doppler Ultrasound: A Report of 24 Patients.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Discussion: Superficial Intramuscular Gluteal Lipograft by Doppler Ultrasound: A Report of 24 Patients.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gluteal fat grafting is a common procedure in liposculpture. This study proposes a Doppler ultrasound-guided intramuscular and subcutaneous gluteal lipotransfer technique that allows for visualization of the location of the gluteal vessels, avoiding approaching them during lipotransfer by having the cannula localized during fat infiltration. Methods: This new technique was applied to 24 women after obtaining informed consent and providing them with a clear explanation of potential risks and complications. Doppler ultrasound was used to locate the site and depth of blood vessels, and for quadrant scanning of vessels and superficial intramuscular visualization of the cannula's location. Intramuscular lipotransfer was performed with a volume of 400 mL per gluteus (or less), and 12 patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging before and 3 months after surgery. Results: This technique allowed for visualizing the location of the gluteal vessels, and infiltration could be easily performed in patients. In the 24 glutei reviewed postsurgery, from 12 patients who underwent pre- and postsurgery magnetic resonance imaging, intramuscular fat was found; however, there was no migration outside the gluteus maximus muscle. Conclusions: No local or systemic complications were observed. The results of our report show that fat filtration did not migrate outside the gluteus maximus muscle. This finding seeks to promote new research to create theoretical/practical precedents for the intervention of plastic surgeons and, from there, promote the standardization of a new and safe technique.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.