ReviewWorld neurosurgery: X2024
Comparing surgical outcomes: Craniotomy versus decompressive craniectomy in acute subdural hematoma - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in World neurosurgery: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- PROMISE: Prognostic Radiomic Outcome Measurement in Acute Subdural Hematoma Evacuation Post-Craniotomy.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Clinical profile of patients with acute traumatic brain injury undergoing cranial surgery in the United States: report from the 18-centre TRACK-TBI cohort study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2024Article
- Indications and scientific support for supratentorial unilateral decompressive craniectomy for different subgroups of patients: A scoping review.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Development of a delayed chronic subdural haematoma 3 years after traumatic brain injury with urinary incontinence: a case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Acute subdural hematomas (SDH) pose a significant health risk, often resulting from traumatic head injuries. The choice between surgical interventions, craniotomy, and decompressive craniectomy, remains a subject of debate. This meta-analysis aims to compare outcomes and guide clinical decision-making. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in databases such as Ovid Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane, up to December 2023. Selection criteria included studies comparing craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy for acute SDH. Data extraction utilized the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Tool, and statistical analysis employed the random-effects model. Results: The meta-analysis included 17 studies and 6848 patients. Craniotomy demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality rates (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.89, Conclusion: The meta-analysis suggests that craniotomy may be a favorable surgical strategy for acute SDH, displaying a significant decrease in mortality rates and a lower risk of raised intracranial pressure. However, the nuanced nature of outcomes emphasizes the need for a tailored approach, considering broader clinical contexts. Future research should address limitations and provide a basis for well-informed clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.