Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38623305›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2024

Enhancing fraud detection in banking by integration of graph databases with machine learning.

Ayushi Patil, Shreya Mahajan, Jinal Menpara, Shivali Wagle, Preksha Pareek, Ketan Kotecha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ayushi PatilArtificial Intelligence & Machine Learning Department, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra 412115, India.
Shreya MahajanArtificial Intelligence & Machine Learning Department, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra 412115, India.
Jinal MenparaArtificial Intelligence & Machine Learning Department, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra 412115, India.
Shivali WagleArtificial Intelligence & Machine Learning Department, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra 412115, India.
Preksha PareekArtificial Intelligence & Machine Learning Department, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra 412115, India.
Ketan KotechaSymbiosis Centre for Applied Artificial Intelligence, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International Deemed University Maharashtra, Pune 412115, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The banking sector's shift from traditional physical locations to digital channels has offered customers unprecedented convenience and increased the risk of fraud for customers and institutions alike. In this study, we discuss the pressing need for robust fraud detection & prevention systems in the context of evolving technological environments. We introduce a graph-based machine learning model that is specifically designed to detect fraudulent activity in various types of banking operations, such as credit card transactions, debit card transactions, and online banking transactions. This model uses advanced methods for anomalies, behaviors, and patterns to analyze past transactions and user behavior almost immediately. We provide an in-depth methodology for evaluating fraud detection systems based on parameters such as Accuracy Recall rate and False positive rate ROC curves. The findings can be used by financial institutions to develop and enhance fraud detection strategies as they demonstrate the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed approach. This study emphasizes the critical role that innovative technologies play in safeguarding the financial sector from the ever-changing strategies of fraudsters while also enhancing banking security.•This paper aims to implement the detection of fraudulent transactions using a state-of-the-art Graph Database approach.•The relational graph of features in the dataset used is modelled using Neo4J as a graph database.•Applying JSON features from the exported graph to various Machine Learning models, giving effective outcomes.

Indexed as

Bank transactionsFintechFraud detectionGraph based fraud detectionMachine learning algorithmsOnline banking

Identifiers

PMID38623305
PMCPMC11016795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.