ArticleHeliyon2024
Using machine learning methods to study the tumour microenvironment and its biomarkers in osteosarcoma metastasis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative bioinformatics approaches for early detection biomarkers in ovarian cancer.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- The solute carrier family 11 transporters: a bridge between iron homeostasis and tumor biology.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025Review
- Whole‑exome evolutionary profiling of osteosarcoma uncovers metastasis‑related driver mutations and generates an independently validated predictive classifier.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The long-term prognosis for patients with osteosarcoma (OS) metastasis remains unfavourable, highlighting the urgent need for research that explores potential biomarkers using innovative methodologies. Methods: This study explored potential biomarkers for OS metastasis by analysing data from the Cancer Genome Atlas Program (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. The synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) was employed to tackle class imbalances, while genes were selected using four feature selection algorithms (Monte Carlo feature selection [MCFS], Borota, minimum-redundancy maximum-relevance [mRMR], and light gradient-boosting machine [LightGBM]) based on the gene expression matrix. Four machine learning (ML) algorithms (support vector machine [SVM], extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost], random forest [RF], and k-nearest neighbours [kNN]) were utilized to determine the optimal number of genes for building the model. Interpretable machine learning (IML) was applied to construct prediction networks, revealing potential relationships among the selected genes. Additionally, enrichment analysis, survival analysis, and immune infiltration were performed on the featured genes. Results: In DS1, DS2, and DS3, the IML algorithm identified 53, 45, and 46 features, respectively. Using the merged gene set, we obtained a total of 79 interpretable prediction rules for OS metastasis. We subsequently conducted an in-depth investigation on 39 crucial molecules associated with predicting OS metastasis, elucidating their roles within the tumour microenvironment. Importantly, we found that certain genes act as both predictors and differentially expressed genes. Finally, our study unveiled statistically significant differences in survival between the high and low expression groups of TRIP4, S100A9, SELL and SLC11A1, and there was a certain correlation between these genes and 22 various immune cells. Conclusions: The biomarkers discovered in this study hold significant implications for personalized therapies, potentially enhancing the clinical prognosis of patients with OS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.