ArticleHeliyon2024
A real-world comparison of circulating tumor cells in breast cancer from China: Novel device, CTC counts and its overall survival.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Circulating Tumor Cell Detection for Therapeutic and Prognostic Roles in Breast Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Advances in isolation and detection technologies and immunotherapy applications of circulating tumor cells (Review).Oncology reports · 2026Review
- Liquid biopsy of circulating tumor cells: From isolation, enrichment, and genome sequencing to clinical applications.Histology and histopathology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Both CellSearch and CellCollector have been accepted as the proper devices to capture CTC by domestic approval department. However, there is little article about the comparison between these two devices around the world. Herein, we conducted the real-world study to compare with these two devices and to re-verify the efficacy of CTC counts. Methods: Patients who meet the following points should be included in the analysis. 1. Female, aged 18 years or older; 2. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score 0-2; 3. With at least one measurable tumor lesion; 4. Clear immunohistochemistry result; 5. Accept at least one CTC test. Patients were excluded in the analysis if they had a history of malignant tumors, incomplete follow-up information. Results: 536 metastatic breast cancer patients who had been detected for CTC at least once by CellSearch or CellCollector were included in the analysis. CellCollector Conclusions: Real-world data indicate that CTC is an independent prognostic factor, and CellCollector and CellSearch have their own advantages in CTC detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.