ArticleHeliyon2024
Machine learning based on optimal VOI of multi-sequence MR images to predict lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast cancer.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- MRI Radiomics-Based Machine Learning to Predict Lymphovascular Invasion of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Machine learning model for predicting epidermal growth factor receptor expression status in breast cancer using ultrasound radiomics.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Decoding Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Breast Cancer: The Evolution From Radiomics to Topological Quantification for Predicting Lymphovascular Invasion.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Lymphovascular invasion serves as a crucial prognostic indicator in invasive breast cancer, influencing treatment decisions. We aimed to develop a machine learning model utilizing optimal volumes of interest extracted from multisequence magnetic resonance images to predict lymphovascular invasion in patients with invasive breast cancer. Materials and methods: This study comprised 191 patients postoperatively diagnosed with invasive breast cancer through multi-sequence magnetic resonance imaging. Independent predictors were identified through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, culminating in the construction of a clinical model. Radiomic features were extracted from multi-sequence magnetic resonance imaging images across various volume of interest scales (-2 mm, entire, +2 mm, +4 mm, and +6 mm). Subsequently, various radiomic models were developed using machine learning model algorithms, including logistic regression, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, gradient boosting machine, classification and regression tree, and random forest. A hybrid model was then formulated, amalgamating optimal radiomic and clinical models. Results: The area under the curve of the clinical model was 0.757. Among the radiomic models, the most efficient diagnosis was achieved by the k-nearest neighbor-based radiomics-volume of interest (+2 mm), resulting in an area under the curve of 0.780. The hybrid model, integrating the k-nearest neighbor-based radiomics-volume of interest (+2 mm), and the clinical model surpassed the individual clinical and radiomics models, exhibiting a superior area under the curve of 0.864. Conclusion: Utilizing a hybrid approach integrating clinical data and multi-sequence magnetic resonance imaging-derived radiomics models based on the multiscale tumor region volume of interest (+2 mm) proved effective in determining lymphovascular invasion status in patients with invasive breast cancer. This innovative methodology may offer valuable insights for treatment planning and disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.