ArticleHeliyon2024
Heavy metal contamination from fuel station run-off and carwash wastewater: An assessment of ecological risk and experimental treatment.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of car-wash wastewater discharge on urban streams: a case study from Jimma city, southwestern Ethiopia.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2026Article
- Study of the Sedimentation Characteristics of Solids in Carwash Wastewater.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026Article
- Machine learning-driven geochemical fingerprinting and risk characterization of mineral dust across different operational settings in El-Gedida Iron Mine, Egypt.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2025Article
- Human health risk from groundwater consumption: A case study in the Apaaso-Tafo Community in the Bono East Region of Ghana.Heliyon · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fuel station run-off (FSR) and carwash wastewater (CWW) are potential sources of heavy metals contamination in surface waters. High levels of heavy metals can have dire consequences on the ecosystem in receiving waterbodies. Ghanaians demand (and supply) of fuel and vehicle cleaning services has increased sharply with population and economic growth and the trend will continue. In this study, a microwave plasma atomic emission spectrometer was used to analyze the levels of Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn in CWW and FSR from ten fuel stations and ten carwash facilities in the Oforikrom and Ejisu Municipalities in the Ashanti Region of Ghana. An experimental sand filter bed augmented with charcoal was used to treat the CWW and FSR. The efficacy of the treatment and the potential ecological risk posed by the untreated CWW and FSR were assessed using single- (contamination factor, CF) and multi-element ecological risk indicators (potential ecological risk index, PERI). The findings showed that CWW contained 0.07 mg/L Cr, 0.20 mg/L Cu, 0.02 mg/L Ni, 1.16 mg/L Pb, and 0.58 mg/L of Zn, while, FSR contained 0.05 mg/L Cr, 0.09 mg/L Cu, 0.17 mg/L Ni, 0.31 mg/L Pb, and 0.18 mg/L Zn. Copper levels in CWW and FSR were positively correlated (0.8), suggesting similar sources of contamination. CF revealed that Cr, Cu, Ni, and Zn in CWW and FSR posed low to medium risk, while Pb posed high risk. The PERI also ranked Pb in all samples as extreme pollution, and Ni as severe pollution in FSR. The charcoal augmented sand filter effectively removed Pb (96%), Cu (61%), and Zn (79%) in both CWW and FSR. Therefore, Ghana EPA and Department of Urban Planning policies should include the construction of a charcoal-augmented sand filtration system at FS and CW facilities to intercept and treat wastewater and run-off before discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.