Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38623046›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2024

Replication of [AT/TA]

Kara G Pytko, Rachel L Dannenberg, Kristin A Eckert, Mark Hedglin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kara G PytkoDepartment of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States.
Rachel L DannenbergDepartment of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States.
Kristin A EckertDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Jake Gittlen Laboratories for Cancer Research, Hershey, PA 17033, United States.
Mark HedglinDepartment of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2599-1691
Pennsylvania State University · USHershey (United States) · US

Funding

Pro-tumorigenic functions of human DNA polymerases eta and kappa during genome duplication under physiological replication stress conditionsR01CA237153 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI ECKERT, KRISTIN A · 2019 to 2023
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA237153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragile sites are unstable genomic regions that are prone to breakage during stressed DNA replication. Several common fragile sites (CFS) contain A+T-rich regions including perfect [AT/TA] microsatellite repeats that may collapse into hairpins when in single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) form and coincide with chromosomal hotspots for breakage and rearrangements. While many factors contribute to CFS instability, evidence exists for replication stalling within [AT/TA] microsatellite repeats. Currently, it is unknown how stress causes replication stalling within [AT/TA] microsatellite repeats. To investigate this, we utilized FRET to characterize the structures of [AT/TA]

Indexed as

DNA Polymerase IIIDNA ReplicationDNA, Single-StrandedHoloenzymesHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsNucleotidesReplication Protein ADNA Polymerase IIIDNA, Single-StrandedHoloenzymesNucleotidesReplication Protein ARPA1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID38623046
PMCPMC12121678
OpenAlexW4393232037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.