Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38622634›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2024

Towards efficient motor imagery interventions after lower-limb amputation.

Elodie Saruco, Arnaud Saimpont, Franck Di Rienzo, Benjamin De Witte, Isabelle Laroyenne, Fanny Matéo, Marion Lapenderie, Sarah Goutte Solard, Isabelle Perretant, Charlotte Frenot and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Elodie SarucoUniversite Lyon 1, LIBM, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, UR 7424, Villeurbanne, F-69622, France.
Arnaud SaimpontUniversite Lyon 1, LIBM, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, UR 7424, Villeurbanne, F-69622, France.
Franck Di RienzoUniversite Lyon 1, LIBM, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, UR 7424, Villeurbanne, F-69622, France.
Benjamin De WitteUniversite Lyon 1, LIBM, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, UR 7424, Villeurbanne, F-69622, France.
Isabelle LaroyenneCentre Médico-Chirurgical de Réadaptation des Massues - Croix-Rouge française, 92 rue Dr. Edmond Locard, Lyon Cedex 05, 69322, France.
Fanny MatéoCentre Médico-Chirurgical de Réadaptation des Massues - Croix-Rouge française, 92 rue Dr. Edmond Locard, Lyon Cedex 05, 69322, France.
Marion LapenderieCentre Médico-Chirurgical de Réadaptation des Massues - Croix-Rouge française, 92 rue Dr. Edmond Locard, Lyon Cedex 05, 69322, France.
Sarah Goutte SolardCentre Médico-Chirurgical de Réadaptation des Massues - Croix-Rouge française, 92 rue Dr. Edmond Locard, Lyon Cedex 05, 69322, France.
Isabelle PerretantCentre Médico-Chirurgical de Réadaptation des Massues - Croix-Rouge française, 92 rue Dr. Edmond Locard, Lyon Cedex 05, 69322, France.
Charlotte FrenotCentre Médico-Chirurgical de Réadaptation des Massues - Croix-Rouge française, 92 rue Dr. Edmond Locard, Lyon Cedex 05, 69322, France.
Philip L JacksonÉcole de Psychologie, Université Laval, Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Réadaptation et Intégration Sociale (CIRRIS), Quebec, Canada.
Aymeric GuillotUniversite Lyon 1, LIBM, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, UR 7424, Villeurbanne, F-69622, France. aymeric.guillot@univ-lyon1.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe therapeutic benefits of motor imagery (MI) are now well-established in different populations of persons suffering from central nervous system impairments. However, research on similar efficacy of MI interventions after amputation remains scarce, and experimental studies were primarily designed to explore the effects of MI after upper-limb amputations.

objectivesThe present comparative study therefore aimed to assess the effects of MI on locomotion recovery following unilateral lower-limb amputation.

methodsNineteen participants were assigned either to a MI group (n = 9) or a control group (n = 10). In addition to the course of physical therapy, they respectively performed 10 min per day of locomotor MI training or neutral cognitive exercises, five days per week. Participants' locomotion functions were assessed through two functional tasks: 10 m walking and the Timed Up and Go Test. Force of the amputated limb and functional level score reflecting the required assistance for walking were also measured. Evaluations were scheduled at the arrival at the rehabilitation center (right after amputation), after prosthesis fitting (three weeks later), and at the end of the rehabilitation program. A retention test was also programed after 6 weeks.

resultsWhile there was no additional effect of MI on pain management, data revealed an early positive impact of MI for the 10 m walking task during the pre-prosthetic phase, and greater performance during the Timed Up and Go Test during the prosthetic phase. Also, a lower proportion of participants still needed a walking aid after MI training. Finally, the force of the amputated limb was greater at the end of rehabilitation for the MI group.

conclusionTaken together, these data support the integration of MI within the course of physical therapy in persons suffering from lower-limb amputations.

Indexed as

AmputeesArtificial LimbsAmputation, SurgicalHumansPostural BalanceTime and Motion StudiesWalkingAmputeesClinical rehabilitationMental practiceMotor recovery

Identifiers

PMID38622634
PMCPMC11017566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.