Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38622619›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2024

Early prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus using maternal demographic and clinical risk factors.

Yanqi Wu, Paul Hamelmann, Myrthe van der Ven, Sima Asvadi, M Beatrijs van der Hout-van der Jagt, S Guid Oei, Massimo Mischi, Jan Bergmans, Xi Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yanqi WuDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Paul HamelmannPhilips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Myrthe van der VenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Sima AsvadiPhilips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
M Beatrijs van der Hout-van der JagtDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
S Guid OeiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Massimo MischiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Jan BergmansDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Xi LongDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. x.long@tue.nl.

Funding

China Scholarship Council 201906340168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo build and validate an early risk prediction model for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) based on first-trimester electronic medical records including maternal demographic and clinical risk factors.

methodsTo develop and validate a GDM prediction model, two datasets were used in this retrospective study. One included data of 14,015 pregnant women from Máxima Medical Center (MMC) in the Netherlands. The other was from an open-source database nuMoM2b including data of 10,038 nulliparous pregnant women, collected in the USA. Widely used maternal demographic and clinical risk factors were considered for modeling. A GDM prediction model based on elastic net logistic regression was trained from a subset of the MMC data. Internal validation was performed on the remaining MMC data to evaluate the model performance. For external validation, the prediction model was tested on an external test set from the nuMoM2b dataset.

resultsAn area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.81 was achieved for early prediction of GDM on the MMC test data, comparable to the performance reported in previous studies. While the performance markedly decreased to an AUC of 0.69 when testing the MMC-based model on the external nuMoM2b test data, close to the performance trained and tested on the nuMoM2b dataset only (AUC = 0.70).

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalDemographyFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsClinical risk factorsEarly predictionGestational diabetes mellitusMaternal demographicsModel validation

Identifiers

PMID38622619
PMCPMC11021008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.