Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38622595›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024

Decision support systems for antibiotic prescription in hospitals: a survey with hospital managers on factors for implementation.

Pinar Tokgöz, Stephan Krayter, Jessica Hafner, Christoph Dockweiler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pinar TokgözSchool of Life Sciences, Department Digital Health Sciences and Biomedicine, Professorship of Digital Public Health, University of Siegen, 57068, Siegen, Germany. pinar.tokgoez@uni-siegen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4720-963X
Stephan KrayterSchool of Life Sciences, Department Digital Health Sciences and Biomedicine, Professorship of Digital Public Health, University of Siegen, 57068, Siegen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1207-494X
Jessica HafnerSchool of Life Sciences, Department Digital Health Sciences and Biomedicine, Professorship of Digital Public Health, University of Siegen, 57068, Siegen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4671-256X
Christoph DockweilerSchool of Life Sciences, Department Digital Health Sciences and Biomedicine, Professorship of Digital Public Health, University of Siegen, 57068, Siegen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1024-3279

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInappropriate antimicrobial use, such as antibiotic intake in viral infections, incorrect dosing and incorrect dosing cycles, has been shown to be an important determinant of the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Artificial intelligence-based decision support systems represent a potential solution for improving antimicrobial prescribing and containing antimicrobial resistance by supporting clinical decision-making thus optimizing antibiotic use and improving patient outcomes.

objectiveThe aim of this research was to examine implementation factors of artificial intelligence-based decision support systems for antibiotic prescription in hospitals from the perspective of the hospital managers, who have decision-making authority for the organization.

methodsAn online survey was conducted between December 2022 and May 2023 with managers of German hospitals on factors for decision support system implementation. Survey responses were analyzed from 118 respondents through descriptive statistics.

resultsSurvey participants reported openness towards the use of artificial intelligence-based decision support systems for antibiotic prescription in hospitals but little self-perceived knowledge in this field. Artificial intelligence-based decision support systems appear to be a promising opportunity to improve quality of care and increase treatment safety. Along with the Human-Organization-Technology-fit model attitudes were presented. In particular, user-friendliness of the system and compatibility with existing technical structures are considered to be important for implementation. The uptake of decision support systems also depends on the ability of an organization to create a facilitating environment that helps to address the lack of user knowledge as well as trust in and skepticism towards these systems. This includes the training of user groups and support of the management level. Besides, it has been assessed to be important that potential users are open towards change and perceive an added value of the use of artificial intelligence-based decision support systems.

conclusionThe survey has revealed the perspective of hospital managers on different factors that may help to address implementation challenges for artificial intelligence-based decision support systems in antibiotic prescribing. By combining factors of user perceptions about the systems´ perceived benefits with external factors of system design requirements and contextual conditions, the findings highlight the need for a holistic implementation framework of artificial intelligence-based decision support systems.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsDecision Support Systems, ClinicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsArtificial IntelligenceHospitalsHumansPrescriptionsSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAntibiotic prescriptionArtificial intelligenceDecision support systemsHospitalImplementation

Identifiers

PMID38622595
PMCPMC11020884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.