Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38622546›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

Ultrasound-based deep learning radiomics model for differentiating benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian tumours: a multi-class classification exploratory study.

Yangchun Du, Wenwen Guo, Yanju Xiao, Haining Chen, Jinxiu Yao, Ji Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Developing and validating ultrasound-based machine-learning models incorporating radiomics features to predict malignancy in adnexal masses.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Radiomics and radiogenomics in ovarian cancer: a review with a focus on ultrasound applications.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yangchun DuDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No.6 Shuangyong Road, Qingxiu District, 530021, Nanning, China.
Wenwen GuoDepartment of Pathology, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region & Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, No.6 Taoyuan Road, Qingxiu District, 530021, Nanning, China.
Yanju XiaoDepartment of Ultrasound, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region & Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, No.6 Taoyuan Road, Qingxiu District, 530021, Nanning, China.
Haining ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region & Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, No.6 Taoyuan Road, Qingxiu District, 530021, Nanning, China.
Jinxiu YaoDepartment of Ultrasound, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region & Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, No.6 Taoyuan Road, Qingxiu District, 530021, Nanning, China.
Ji WuDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No.6 Shuangyong Road, Qingxiu District, 530021, Nanning, China. gxnnwuji@163.com.

Funding

The Guangxi Medical"139" Project for Training High-level Backbone Talents G201903014The Guangxi Promotion of Appropriate Health Technologies Project S2021055The Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 2023GXNSFDA026010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate preoperative identification of ovarian tumour subtypes is imperative for patients as it enables physicians to custom-tailor precise and individualized management strategies. So, we have developed an ultrasound (US)-based multiclass prediction algorithm for differentiating between benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian tumours.

methodsWe randomised data from 849 patients with ovarian tumours into training and testing sets in a ratio of 8:2. The regions of interest on the US images were segmented and handcrafted radiomics features were extracted and screened. We applied the one-versus-rest method in multiclass classification. We inputted the best features into machine learning (ML) models and constructed a radiomic signature (Rad_Sig). US images of the maximum trimmed ovarian tumour sections were inputted into a pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) model. After internal enhancement and complex algorithms, each sample's predicted probability, known as the deep transfer learning signature (DTL_Sig), was generated. Clinical baseline data were analysed. Statistically significant clinical parameters and US semantic features in the training set were used to construct clinical signatures (Clinic_Sig). The prediction results of Rad_Sig, DTL_Sig, and Clinic_Sig for each sample were fused as new feature sets, to build the combined model, namely, the deep learning radiomic signature (DLR_Sig). We used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) to estimate the performance of the multiclass classification model.

resultsThe training set included 440 benign, 44 borderline, and 196 malignant ovarian tumours. The testing set included 109 benign, 11 borderline, and 49 malignant ovarian tumours. DLR_Sig three-class prediction model had the best overall and class-specific classification performance, with micro- and macro-average AUC of 0.90 and 0.84, respectively, on the testing set. Categories of identification AUC were 0.84, 0.85, and 0.83 for benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian tumours, respectively. In the confusion matrix, the classifier models of Clinic_Sig and Rad_Sig could not recognise borderline ovarian tumours. However, the proportions of borderline and malignant ovarian tumours identified by DLR_Sig were the highest at 54.55% and 63.27%, respectively.

conclusionsThe three-class prediction model of US-based DLR_Sig can discriminate between benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian tumours. Therefore, it may guide clinicians in determining the differential management of patients with ovarian tumours.

Indexed as

Deep LearningOvarian NeoplasmsAlgorithmsFemaleHumansRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyDeep transfer learning signatureHand-crafted radiomicsMulti-class classification modelOvarian tumourUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID38622546
PMCPMC11020982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.