Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38622521›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Evaluation of incision healing status after transverse uterine fundal incision for cesarean delivery and postoperative pregnancy: a ten-year single-center retrospective study.

Fumikazu Kotsuji, Takashi Shibata, Satoshi Nakago, Hiroki Kato, Sayoko Hosono, Yasunori Fukuoka, Koji Nishijima

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Placenta accreta spectrum.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fumikazu Kotsuji *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Takatsuki General Hospital, Takatsuki, Japan.
Takashi Shibata *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Takatsuki General Hospital, Takatsuki, Japan.
Satoshi NakagoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Takatsuki General Hospital, Takatsuki, Japan.
Hiroki KatoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Takatsuki General Hospital, Takatsuki, Japan.
Sayoko HosonoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Takatsuki General Hospital, Takatsuki, Japan.
Yasunori FukuokaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Takatsuki General Hospital, Takatsuki, Japan.
Koji NishijimaCenter for Perinatal, Maternal and Neonatal Medicine, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan. kojigyne@med.niigata-u.ac.jp.
Takatsuki General Hospital · JPNiigata University Medical and Dental Hospital · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21592092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransverse uterine fundal incision (TUFI) is a beneficial procedure for mothers and babies at risk due to placenta previa-accreta, and has been implemented worldwide. However, the risk of uterine rupture during a subsequent pregnancy remains unclear. We therefore evaluated the TUFI wound scar to determine the approval criteria for pregnancy after this surgery.

methodsBetween April 2012 and August 2022, we performed TUFI on 150 women. Among 132 of the 150 women whose uteruses were preserved after TUFI, 84 women wished to conceive again. The wound healing status, scar thickness, and resumption of blood flow were evaluated in these women by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and sonohysterogram at 12 months postoperatively. Furthermore, TUFI scars were directly observed during the Cesarean sections in women who subsequently conceived.

resultsTwelve women were lost to follow-up and one conceived before the evaluation, therefore 71 cases were analyzed. MRI scans revealed that the "scar thickness", the thinnest part of the scar compared with the normal surrounding area, was ≥ 50% in all cases. The TUFI scars were enhanced in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI except for four women. However, the scar thickness in these four patients was greater than 80%. Twenty-three of the 71 women conceived after TUFI and delivered live babies without notable problems until August 2022. Their MRI scans before pregnancy revealed scar thicknesses of 50-69% in two cases and ≥ 70% in the remaining 21 cases. And resumption of blood flow was confirmed in all patients except two cases whose scar thickness ≥ 90%. No evidence of scar healing failure was detected at subsequent Cesarean sections, but partial thinning was found in two patients whose scar thicknesses were 50-69%. In one woman who conceived seven months after TUFI and before the evaluation, uterine rupture occurred at 26 weeks of gestation.

conclusionsCertain criteria, including an appropriate suture method, delayed conception for at least 12 months, evaluation of the TUFI scar at 12 months postoperatively, and cautious postoperative management, must all be met in order to approve a post-TUFI pregnancy. Possible scar condition criteria for permitting a subsequent pregnancy could include the scar thickness being ≥ 70% of the surrounding area on MRI scans, at least partially resumed blood flow, and no abnormalities on the sonohysterogram.

trial registrationRetrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Placenta AccretaSurgical WoundUterine RuptureCesarean SectionCicatrixFemaleHumansPregnancyRetrospective StudiesUterusCesarean sectionObstetricsPostoperative pregnancyTransverse uterine fundal incisionUterine ruptureWound scar

Identifiers

PMID38622521
PMCPMC11017641
OpenAlexW4394813250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.