Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38622484›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of biomedical engineering2024

Habituation of Brain Activity with Repetition in Color and Picture-Word Stroop Tests.

Senichiro Kikuchi, Nobutaka Tsutsui, Yusuke Nishizawa, Kenji Tsuchiya, Kaori Shimoda, Kazuki Hirao, Fumikazu Miwakeichi

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Senichiro KikuchiDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Gunma University Graduate School of Health Sciences, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8514, Japan. senichiro@gunma-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3959-4734
Nobutaka TsutsuiWakaba Hospital, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Yusuke NishizawaDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Gunma University Graduate School of Health Sciences, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8514, Japan.
Kenji TsuchiyaDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Gunma University Graduate School of Health Sciences, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8514, Japan.
Kaori ShimodaDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Gunma University Graduate School of Health Sciences, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8514, Japan.
Kazuki HiraoDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Gunma University Graduate School of Health Sciences, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8514, Japan.
Fumikazu MiwakeichiDepartment of Statistical Modelling, The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tachikawa, Tokyo, Japan.
Gunma University · JPThe Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI · JPWakaba Hospital · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP16K01497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a widely used mental task for functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), the original color-word Stroop task has the advantage of being difficult to habituate, but also the disadvantage of being difficult to understand, especially for children. While the introduction of derived Stroop tasks offers highly promising countermeasures, changes in brain activity during these tests have not been well tested. We investigated the degree of habituation between the original and a derived Stroop task by measuring brain activity to obtain a better fNIRS task design. Fourteen healthy adults participated in the study, and a 10-channel fNIRS device was used. A picture-word Stroop task with lower linguistic conflict than the original was conducted. The original and derived Stroop tests were repeated four times in a 1-week interval. We found that the original Stroop test did not show any significant changes in brain activity with repeated measures; however, brain activity decreased during the derived test. The differences in habituation between the original and derived tests may be due to the differences in the strength of the linguistic conflict. Our findings also highlight the need to consider the effects of habituation when using derived Stroop tasks in repeated measures.

Indexed as

BrainHabituation, PsychophysiologicSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredStroop TestAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultCognitive conflictHabituationNear-infrared spectroscopyPost-losing rock-paper-scissors testStroop test

Identifiers

PMID38622484
OpenAlexW4394820632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.