ArticleMolecular biology reports2024
Delving the vitamin D receptor variation and expression profiles in the context of type 2 diabetes among families.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Article
- Association of polymorphism of NLRP3, ICAM-1, PTPN22, INS genes in childhood onset type 1 diabetes in a Pakistani population.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVitamin D is essential for insulin secretion and sensitivity. Consequently, its inadequacy is linked to higher insulin resistance and Type 2 Diabetes (T2D). The Vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene is one potential candidate for T2D, and multiple polymorphisms in VDR have been examined in various populations, but no conclusive answers have been provided.
objectivesThis study was designed to evaluate the susceptibility of VDR gene polymorphism and its expression in diabetic families in Pakistan. METHODOLOGY: In this family-based study, twenty diabetic families with a positive family history of T2D and at least three T2D patients were recruited from outpatient clinics and public hospitals. The current study comprised 143 individuals with 55 affected and 88 unaffected individuals. Blood samples of the selected families were collected. DNA was extracted from the collected samples and the PCR-RFLP method was followed to identify the genotyping and RT-qPCR for expression. Phenotypic and genotypic pedigrees of the families were developed by the progeny online tool. The association values of SNPs were determined by TDT and DFAM analysis implemented on Plink software.
resultsThe results explained a significant familial aggregation among phenotypic characters including Age, Gender, BMI (body mass index), age of disease diagnosis, disease duration, and blood pressure in the probands, affected FDRs (First Degree Relatives) and affected SDRs (Second Degree Relatives). A significant association of rs731236 C/T (OR = 1.522), rs2228570 C/T (OR = 1.327) with p < 0.05. Whereas, for rs1544410 G/A (OR = 0.9706) and rs7975232 T/G (OR = 0.7368) no considerable association evidence was seen (p > 0.05) in families. The mRNA expression of VDR increased threefold (p = 0.0204) in patients compared to controls. Variation-based expression analysis exhibited that the rs2228570 genotype influences the expression.
conclusionA linkage was found among the FDRs with probands. Variation in the gene VDR at loci rs731236 and rs2228570 was associated with familial T2D. However further research is required to explore more genetic factors that could influence T2D risks in families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.