Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38622475›Full record

ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2024

Acceptability and Feasibility of Initiating a Low Fat Eating Plan in Reproductive Aged Women with Obesity.

Nanette Santoro, Nicola Hendricks, Lauren Gibbs, Katherine Kuhn, Andrew P Bradford, Dorothy Mitchell-Leef

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nanette SantoroDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E 17th Avenue, Academic Office 1 Room 4004, Mail Stop B-198, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. Nanette.Santoro@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9096-7490
Nicola HendricksDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E 17th Avenue, Academic Office 1 Room 4004, Mail Stop B-198, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Lauren GibbsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30310, USA.
Katherine KuhnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E 17th Avenue, Academic Office 1 Room 4004, Mail Stop B-198, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Andrew P BradfordDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E 17th Avenue, Academic Office 1 Room 4004, Mail Stop B-198, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Dorothy Mitchell-LeefDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30310, USA.
University of Colorado Denver · USMorehouse School of Medicine · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adverse effects of obesity on reproduction are believed in part due to diet related factors leading to hyperlipidemia and hyperinsulinemia. It is unknown whether administration of a low fat eating plan, regardless of weight loss, will improve reproductive axis function in women with obesity. To develop an acceptable and feasible low fat eating plan for a diverse group of reproductive aged women with obesity. Focus groups to determine preferences and barriers to a planned dietary intervention providing very low fat (22% daily calories from fat) eucaloric food to control fat exposure, but not cause weight loss. Logistics of the intervention and monitoring over three menstrual cycles were discussed. Eighteen women enrolled into 4 different focus groups both live and video, 2 at the University of Colorado and 2 at the Morehouse School of Medicine. All participants expressed interest in implementing a low fat dietary intervention and were further interested in instruction on how to maintain healthy eating habits for future fertility. Provision of ethnically appropriate foods, social support to avoid lapses, and tasty alternatives to high fat foods were considered ideal aspects of a feasible intervention. Incentives and graduated compensation for adherence were considered desirable features. Women with obesity are interested in implementing dietary interventions that may improve their health and fertility. Given the diversity of responses based upon the demographics of our sample, it is important to assess geographical and cultural preferences prior to implementing of a dietary strategy.

Indexed as

Feasibility StudiesObesityAdultDiet, Fat-RestrictedFeeding BehaviorFemaleFocus GroupsHumansYoung AdultFocus groupsLow fat eating planObesityReproduction

Identifiers

PMID38622475
OpenAlexW4394806244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.