Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38622469›Full record

SynthesisCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2024

Efficacy of different routes of acetaminophen administration for postoperative pain in children: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Danilo Osorio, Diana Maldonado, Koen Rijs, Caroline van der Marel, Markus Klimek, Jose A Calvache

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewComparative StudyNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Danilo OsorioDepartment of Anesthesiology, Universidad del Cauca, Popayán, Colombia.
Diana MaldonadoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Koen RijsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Caroline van der MarelDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Markus KlimekDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jose A CalvacheDepartment of Anesthesiology, Universidad del Cauca, Popayán, Colombia. j.calvacheespana@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-9421-3717
Erasmus MC · NLUniversity of Cauca · COPontificia Universidad Javeriana · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAcetaminophen is the most common drug used to treat acute pain in the pediatric population, given its wide safety margin, low cost, and multiple routes for administration. We sought to determine the most efficacious route of acetaminophen administration for postoperative acute pain relief in the pediatric surgical population.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included children aged between 30 days and 17 yr who underwent any type of surgical procedure and that evaluated the analgesic efficacy of different routes of administration of acetaminophen for the treatment of postoperative pain. We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Embase, CINAHL, LILACs, and Google Scholar databases for trials published from inception to 16 April 2023. We assessed the risk of bias in the included studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 1.0 tool. We performed a frequentist network meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Our primary outcome was postoperative pain using validated pain scales.

resultsWe screened 2,344 studies and included 14 trials with 829 participants in the analysis. We conducted a network meta-analysis for the period from zero to two hours, including six trials with 496 participants. There was no evidence of differences between intravenous vs rectal routes of administration of acetaminophen (difference in means, -0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.62 to 0.06; very low certainty of the evidence) and intravenous vs oral acetaminophen (difference in means, -0.60; 95% CI, -1.20 to 0.01; low certainty of the evidence). For the comparison of oral vs rectal routes, we found evidence favouring the oral route (difference in means, -0.88; 95% CI, -1.44 to -0.31; low certainty of the evidence). Few trials reported secondary outcomes of interest; when comparing the oral and rectal routes in the incidence of nausea and vomiting, there was no evidence of differences (relative risk, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.78).

conclusionThe available evidence on the effect of the administration route of acetaminophen on postoperative pain in children is very uncertain. The outcomes of postoperative pain control and postoperative vomiting may differ very little between the oral and rectal route. Better designed and executed RCTs are required to address this important clinical question. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42021286495); first submitted 19 November 2021.

Indexed as

AcetaminophenAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticPostoperative PainAdministration, OralChildDrug Administration RoutesHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAcetaminophenAnalgesics, Non-Narcoticacetaminophenchildrenmeta-analysispainpostoperativeroute of drug administration

Identifiers

PMID38622469
PMCPMC11269386
OpenAlexW4394822839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.