Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38622456›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgical oncology2024

Detection of Residual Peritoneal Metastases Following Cytoreductive Surgery Using Pegsitacianine, a pH-Sensitive Imaging Agent: Final Results from a Phase II Study.

Patrick Wagner, Edward A Levine, Alex C Kim, Perry Shen, Nicole D Fleming, Shannon N Westin, Laurel K Berry, Giorgos C Karakousis, Janos L Tanyi, Madeline T Olson and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04950166 (A Phase 2, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Performance and Safety of ONM100, an Intraoperative Fluor Imaging Agent for the Detection of Peritoneal Mets), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04950166 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 2, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Performance and Safety of ONM100, an Intraoperative Fluor Imaging Agent for the Detection of Peritoneal Mets

TypeinterventionalSponsorOncoNano Medicine, Inc.Ran2021 to 2023Enrolled51ConditionsPeritoneal CarcinomatosisArmspegsitacianine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick WagnerDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Edward A LevineDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Alex C KimDivision of Surgical Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Perry ShenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Nicole D FlemingDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Shannon N WestinDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Laurel K BerryDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Giorgos C KarakousisDivision of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Janos L TanyiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Madeline T OlsonOncoNano Medicine, Inc, Southlake, TX, USA.
Brian MadajewskiOncoNano Medicine, Inc, Southlake, TX, USA.
Brian OstranderOncoNano Medicine, Inc, Southlake, TX, USA.
Kartik KrishnanOncoNano Medicine, Inc, Southlake, TX, USA.
Charles M BalchDepartment of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
David L BartlettDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. david.bartlett@ahn.org.
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USAllegheny Health Network · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, extent of disease and completeness of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) are major prognostic factors for long-term survival. Assessment of these factors could be improved using imaging agents. Pegsitacianine is a pH-sensitive polymeric micelle conjugated to the fluorophore indocyanine green. The micelle disassembles in acidic microenvironments, such as tumors, resulting in localized fluorescence unmasking. We assessed the utility of pegsitacianine in detecting residual disease following CRS. PATIENTS AND

methodsNCT04950166 was a phase II, non-randomized, open-label, multicenter US study. Patients eligible for CRS were administered an intravenous dose of pegsitacianine at 1 mg/kg 24-72 h before surgery. Following CRS, the peritoneal cavity was reexamined under near-infrared (NIR) illumination to evaluate for fluorescent tissue. Fluorescent tissue identified was excised and evaluated by histopathology. The primary outcome was the rate of clinically significant events (CSE), defined as detection of histologically confirmed residual disease excised with pegsitacianine or a revision in the assessment of completeness of CRS. Secondary outcomes included acceptable safety and pegsitacianine performance.

resultsA total of 53 patients were screened, 50 enrolled, and 40 were evaluable for CSE across six primary tumor types. Residual disease was detected with pegsitacianine in 20 of 40 (50%) patients. Pegsitacianine showed high sensitivity and was well tolerated with no serious adverse events (SAEs). Transient treatment-related, non-anaphylactic infusion reactions occurred in 28% of patients.

conclusionsPegsitacianine was well tolerated and facilitated the recognition of occult residual disease following CRS. The high rate of residual disease detected suggests that the use of pegsitacianine augmented surgeon assessment and performance during CRS.

Indexed as

Cytoreduction Surgical ProceduresIndocyanine GreenNeoplasm, ResidualPeritoneal NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleFluorescent DyesFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisFluorescent DyesIndocyanine GreenComplete resectionFluorescenceNanotechnologyNear-infraredPeritoneal metastasisSurgical oncology

Identifiers

PMID38622456
OpenAlexW4394806078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.